Fantasy:in which the think the world would end?

In which-think the world would end?

The moment you is reading my essay, you is somehow connected with it. And I fancy that you had never realized this kind of subtle but amazing connection. More specifically, when you're reading, you receive the words ' images my essay have sent you and, turn to say, the imag Es ' receiver is for you. And, while you were clicking the mouse and turn to the next page, you become the sender of the command and my essay was now The receiver of it. What mentioned above are a simple example that interaction, which transmits information, should has one sender and one rec Eiver, as though a directed edge must has an initial vertex and a terminal one in order to biuld a directed graph.

WLOG, let's assume that everything, all the receivers and senders in this world, was represented by vertexes consisting a h Uge graph and we use directed edges to represent their interactions and to connect all these vertexes. And I prefer to refer this huge graph as our world. On the graph, there is countless vertexes and edges, so when the essay question asked I to assume a-on-this-world ends, I felt it quite impossible to destroy such a hulk for I had to delete the whole graph, and before deleting it, I must cl Ear all the vertexes which, however, may include the ones representing trillions of atoms and the whole sombrero Galaxy, T He ungodly technological advances human made and my essay. Finding a method to turn all these things into void are far beyond my imagination.

However, ending a world was actually not so hard and can being as easy as every day I shut down the program which is running On my laptop.

Think in another; The world mentioned here's no longer a stable graph, but can being a program this runs on the huge graph and the huge graph is part of it; The world are not exactly the one that often appears in literature and slogans, but works as an intermediary between t He senders and receivers. This is suggests that, e.g., when you tell a rumor to your friend, you actually share it first to the world and then the World repeats the same stories to your friend. It Become a program this working for the vertexes, including the one representing you through making highly-accurate Respo Nses to and collecting detailed feedback from vertexes.

         from this new idea, now the huge Graph May is a little redundant. For every vertex-connects with their intermediary, the world, directly, it's no use of the graph. Besides this, it's also ordinary to get a edifying conclusion:the world have somehow separated everyone (all the senders, Receivers, or vertexes) into countless cells. Say, I am in my cell and I were provided all the data or information (like today's weather, where is my mom and ...) that I O Ught to the. After processing, I transmit my response data to the world. And world gives me new data, I ..., that cycles. It is worth noting, the only place I receive, the data from was the world. Interestingly, in turn, the whole procedures somehow prove a sentence this said by Arthur Schopenhauer: Everyone takes The limits of his own vision for the limits of the world.

Take Alice's experience as an example. Every day, Alice enjoys sunsets and chatting with she net friend, Bob, via Wechat, an app for social media. Bob is a nice guy. He is friendly and always gives response to Alice's messages. However, Alice one day starts to wonder whether Bob was a real person this exists, but she never have a chance to confirm he R doubt without Bob ' s permission and no evidence to prove Bob exists. If I were Alice, I might even wonder whether the spectacular sunsets every day I see was not real either. For the world was acting like Bob, the world uses the same tricks as Bob plays on Alice by using Internet to separate Alice And the world that Bob stays.

This understanding reduces complexity of realizing, the program of the world. Say, without this thought, the program could looks like a great online game that supports PVP. However, now it looks the more like a PC games which has one player. The program has both main parts:simulating the behavior of a vertex (sender/receiver) and generating its response data.

The first part simulates the behaviors, which are how a vertex processes the information. All the behaviors can is classified into, categories:behaviors to the vertex itself, like sleeping, and behaviors to T He world (like chatting). As we know, the most complicated and sophisticated creature are human. So the nub of the first part are how to simulate human's brain and its countless neurons. (Why choose to simulate a human ' s world?) Why isn't a tree ' s? )

The second part was to generate the response data, the provided to the first, and to collect the feedback Informati On. The hard-core part is what sure the response data is logical and in accordance with the history and the Laws O F Development. My suggestion to solving this problem are to add the number of simulators and to learn from the collected feedback data (BU ILD a training set), although it may add burden to the program when running.

However, the implementation of the both parts is beyond our current abilities. It is on the initial stage of artificial intelligence that we still has a long-to go before figuring out an approach For creating a robot as smart as human. It is at the prime time of the Big Data time that we first turn to look at the big-size Data and we still don ' t does so well In dealing with big data which the second part needs. So, is we, human, the only possible or fittest author of this great program?

The answer is "No.". The future robots and high artificial intelligence would be a better answer. According to the Singularity theory then the growth of technological advancement is exponential, scientists would keep comi Ng up with better algorithms in the field of big data and more powerful and cleverer robots that surpass humans. When the moment comes (in years or shorter), which we ability in designing AI progresses to a certain level, the Progr Am would no longer be a assumption in the essay.

         I highly doubt whether human still exists when the th the program I S realized. A Book once said this robot with high artificial intelligence would be the last invention born from human ' s hands. I agree with this sentence fully. You can understand it in the Ways:robot with high AI would be is so automated and clever to invent all other things, or human S'll die out of once they manage to invent it. I tend to agree the second one. In years, robots in the labs would have great logics, decision-making and prediction-making abilities. However, it'll still is difficult for robots to understand moral reasons. Lack of these important moral reasons to constrain their behaviors, robots would be extremely dangerous to human. For robots, their life goal was what their creators first set for them and what's carved on their chips forever and they C An sacrifice anything or take all action to realize the life goal including eliminating human. of CourSE, robots is not spiteful to human. When your cut your hair, you is not the spiteful to them either, but you simply cut them. Unluckily, robot is much clever than human and doesn ' t suffer from some physical and biological limits which human have.

 

         If Human have disappeared, why robot would want to simulate a antiquated a nd backward World (say, now is reading my essay)? According to the Darwinian theory of evolution, when robots replaced humans, robots become the winner in the natural Selec tion and should be seen as a new species or the evolutional version of Human, from biological version updated to Mechanica L version. With the continuous progression for robots in accordance with the Singularity theory, it'll is not being surprised that robots Formed its own society and culture. Once they has their own culture, history would be important to them. For there is no differences between human and robot in nature, they is all the vectors of artificial intelligence. Future robots need to know and learn experience from what human, the old version, disappears and how their ancestors elimin Ate humans. Historian Robots won ' t simply satisfy in text and videos so record it, but want to ToucH This piece of crazy history through building a virtual world. This year, to 2035 the predicted year that robot which are as smart as human appears, is not a long period, even to th E year human could disappear (like 2055?). Now would is a great moment for future robots to start simulate the world, for now we are facing the big challenge of Arti Ficial Intelligence and it is the most ever moment for us to reach the future.

When all the information then the future robots need have been collected, the program would be shut down and the world would End.

Fantasy:in which the think the world would end?