Atlas-to prevent network Infringement

To quickly learn about Ajax and Atlas, you can browse and watch the video tutorial "Ajax and Atlas development" by Su Peng's lecturer. The electronic version of "ajax basic tutorial" also includes dflying Chen (Chen lifu) as well as Su Peng's blog and Su Peng's personal website.
If you have browsed the previous blog or personal website, you will also find that the content in the "Ajax and Atlas development" video tutorial by Su Peng cited in the dflying Chen blog involves infringement issues, of course, Su Peng admitted his mistakes. I personally think it is still rational to solve this problem, but it is somewhat expanded.
Why is the solution rational?
First, in today's society, many people have taken up legal weapons to protect themselves. When we encounter such infringement of our rights, we will always think of the law. However, I personally think that legal weapons are the last weapon we use when dealing with civil disputes. It is best for both parties to solve them in private, that is, Private. However, most of the civil disputes should be resolved through coordination. In fact, the same is true for courts. I used to use software to hear cases for courts. Therefore, it is clear that there are many civil cases in grass-roots Courts, the Court generally hopes that both parties can mediate out of court and withdraw the lawsuit by one party. This is the best solution. If mediation is not possible, the court will make a decision.
Secondly, dflying Chen did a good job in this case. He did not have to go to court and did not accept the mediation request from Su Peng's Lecturer (dflying Chen did not fully adopt the mediation method ). Although it seems that plagiarism and plagiarism in the Internet cannot be forgiven, legal means must be adopted. But as a Chinese, resolving internal problems within the Chinese people cannot go to court as a foreigner encounters problems. Because China's national conditions are different from those of foreign countries, the Chinese people must have their own solutions.
Finally, dflying Chen is not the first choice or the last legal weapon to handle the matter. I personally think that for dflying Chen, he does not want to solve the problem in plain form (that is, the two are private), which can easily lead to the expansion and spread of such things; however, he does not want to do such things too much, because su Peng does not admit his mistakes, so if he is stubborn and chooses only legal means, from the perspective of human feelings, morality, and law, people will think that this is too much, and there is no room for discussion. Then dflying Chen adopted an organization (such as Microsoft) to solve such problems and adopted a compromise method.
Why is it a little more expanded?
As we have mentioned above, people should first consider ways to solve such problems from the perspective of human feelings and morality and, if not, from the perspective of morality, if not, the last method is to resolve the dispute by legal means.
From the perspective of human feelings, Su Peng has admitted his mistakes and is willing to be private (although the impact may be social, It is a dispute between two people in terms of things). Since it is private, of course, there are private conditions. From the conversation between Su Peng's Lecturer and dflying Chen's MSN, we can understand that dflying Chen did not accept su Peng's private conditions, dflying Chen has handed over the incident to an organization or individual.
From my personal point of view, when a private employee acknowledges his mistake and is able to compensate the victim, as long as both parties understand what the compensation conditions are, and accept it. If it succeeds, Su Peng's Lecturer has done so. Unfortunately, the conditions are not accepted by both parties.
After learning about Atlas, I also learned how to handle problems. I 've always wondered if something happened to dflying Chen happened to me (of course I don't have the advanced technical knowledge of dflying Chen, just make a hypothesis for empathy ), what can I do? Dear friends, how can you solve this kind of problem if it happens to you? This is the empathy method.
I will first choose private from the perspective of human feelings, and then use a third party to solve the problem from the moral perspective, and finally use legal weapons to protect my rights from the legal perspective.