Comparison between MAC, Microsoft, and Apple's secondary pixel rendering technology

The following effects can be achieved with paragraph indent for a while before.

Hello, xxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxx

However, it is found that, in IE, the upper and lower alignment makes safari on the Apple machine unable to be aligned.

Apple alignment, ie is not consistent.

When the screen is displayed, Apple determines that the pixel occupies the full-width length,

In IE, bytes only occupy the length of half-width pixels.

---------------------------------------------------------

The reason is as follows:

Apple and Microsoft always have different opinions on how to display fonts on computer screens. Currently, both companies use subpixel rendering technology to make fonts clear on low-resolution screens. The fundamental difference between the two companies lies in the guiding ideology.

Apple Inc. generally believes that the primary purpose of the font algorithm is to maintain the original design as much as possible, even if it is lossy to the clarity of the screen display, it will not hesitate.

・ Microsoft generally believes that the fontShapeIt is necessary to adapt to the limit of pixels, to ensure that the screen display is not blurred, easy to identify, even if the font shape therefore deviated from the original design, it is not necessary.

The reason is that Apple's rendering algorithm is more loyal to the original font design than Microsoft's, and can present the nuances of the font design in a high-definition state like a print.