Depressed when faced with masters

In the QQ Group, a person named belost asked a technical question about message hook. Then, even a bunch of so-called experts were abstracting and designing them, and then they went far away, no one talks to him
Code. Let him get angry. These people were once famous for their willingness to help others in csdn, but now they have no patience to elaborate on the details of such a message processing. Why?

Me
I think there is a question about the basic dialog. In the past, when we were mixing csdn, we were still doing a lot of coding, and we were also entangled in technical implementation details.
The Foundation isCode. But now, for our group of people, there are very few implementation details that will bother us. For us, what is more important is the design ideas. At this time, the common basis of the dialogue is not
Yes.

For example, if this problem occurs in belost, let's look at the code of the tray control and see how the hook part is implemented. Then let's explain it to him.
This is our idea. But now the problem is that belost cannot understand the code, so what we say to him is nonsense for him. It seems that we are perfunctory, and he is naturally angry.
. For us, it is impossible to explain the code in detail with him. After all, we are not professional teachers and have no such obligation.

In this way, there will naturally be gaps.

So now I usually only need to fill the water in the csdn Forum, because there is no basic problem of conversation, there are rpwt people there, and there is no need to consider RP gap. ^ O ^