Genius and effort

Software genius and technical migrant workers

-- Xue Yong's post-reading feeling of "genius is trained"

Jin xuliang

Http://www.cnblogs.com/bitfan/archive/2010/12/30/1921291.html

After reading the above article, I also want to talk about my views on this issue.

The first question is: Is there a genius?

This problem seems self-evident, but I think it is necessary to clarify the relevant concepts of the problem. Otherwise, it is not conducive to our analysis from the perspective of sensibility.

The so-called genius is a person with superior natural qualifications than ordinary people. What Are qualifications? Qualifications are not equal to knowledge. If no one is born, they will be multiplied. Qualifications are a potential, a container, or a magnifier (about hard work. For example, memory is a container: a person with good memory can remember many things, but a person with poor memory can only remember a small part of things. Ordinary people forget to remember things in a few days, and those with good memories can be clearly remembered for dozens of days. Therefore, memory is a magnifier that can enlarge the memory time.

In general, qualifications refer to the biological functions of the brain or other sensors, such as memory and sensitivity. Genius exists because it is absolutely impossible for a deaf man to become a musician. However, a person who is insensitive to his voice rarely becomes an innate qualification of a musician.

The second question: are successful only those geniuses?

If you compare a qualification to a cup, a person with a high level of capital will be very lazy and only half of his cup will be poured; and a person with poor qualifications, even if he tries again, if you add more water to your small water cup, it will eventually overflow. As long as the size difference of the cup is large enough, a person who does not work very hard can indeed surpass a person who works hard. Moreover, no matter how hard people are, this fact cannot be reversed.

This is a situation. Do we know the size of our cup? The second point is whether the cup will remain unchanged, or can it be compensated the day after tomorrow?

First, let's answer the second question. We know that qualifications are a physiological concept. People are born, old, and dead, and their qualifications are attached to organisms. They will also follow this change. This is taken for granted. For example, a person who never changes from myopia to myopia is a change in his qualifications, which at least will lead him to lose his qualifications as a pilot.

The cup will change naturally, so can we manually control it? This is acceptable. For example, a person who has made the effort to eat milk can just raise 50 kilograms of items. After hard training, he can easily raise 100 kilograms of items. You may think that the qualifications are fixed, but this person has never used the so-called potential. I think that if there is potential, it is also his potential to increase his cup, rather than hiding strength.

The key here is that the reason why he was able to raise it was a physiological change, his body was strong, and his muscles were powerful. This was a change in qualifications. Do we know the size of our cup, the current size and the limit size. There is a limit to the increase of the cup, because it is impossible for a person to run faster than a leopard. This is a physiological limitation determined by species. Of course, if people can use science and tools to implant mechanical legs, there may be real hope.

Are the cups under each person's limits the same? This is difficult to answer, because many people do not know how many of their current cups are. Only those who really fill the cup and see the profit and leakage of the Cup can truly see their own cup. Objectively speaking, for genetic reasons, there should be a gap in the ultimate limit between ordinary people's cups and genius cups. It is common sense that there are differences between individuals in the same species, but at least it is not as big as the differences between different species.

Moreover, we know that a person's extreme state often needs to appear after very hard training. This is why the talents are hard-working people, which are often ignored!

Success is not just about being a genius (because your cup is enough), but it is about to work hard, because few people will naturally be In the best state.

 

Genius and hard work are often seen as contradictions. However, they are actually trying to create a genius, at least by releasing its potential. This is the secret of genius.

 

People often have the following misconceptions:

1. Talented People are talents.

2. the talents of today are talents.

Those who casually claim to see the genius did not see the limit of the so-called "genius", nor did they see the limit of other "Mortal", how to compare? It is possible that, under the limit, those who are seemingly ordinary are actually (potentially) more qualified.

Overall:

A genius without hard work may be a fool.

Ordinary people who do not work hard must be fools.

Hard-working mortals can surpass dummies.

You may never know whether you are a genius.

But you can know whether you are a fool.