Historical Views)

The main reason why I say that our current historical teaching materials are not objective is not objective, but because we have committed the same common problem as the TV series-face-to-face. We draw conclusions from historical figures and events too rashly and arbitrarily. It is often said that the masses of the people demanded that XXX and XXX should be backed up in history. xxxx does not conform to changes in production relations ............ The success or failure will be taken over. This has seriously affected readers, especially those who have not read the original history. For example, Xiang Yu's comment is nothing more than the following words: rash, violent, no political mind, brave, and benevolent; when talking about Tang Taizong, the comment is nothing more than Shen Wen shengwu, qiangu yidi, from the beginning to the cloud. I am afraid it is difficult to tell them the political advantages of Xiang Yu and the political defects of Tang Taizong.

 

However, in terms of common sense, even when we usually consider a very important thing, no matter how pressing it is, we will always come up with a logic on our own, even if this logic proves to be flawed afterwards. So why do we think that the heads of the ancients are all one rib? Xiang Yu, said in the history book that he was talented and Liu Bang was inferior. There is no brain for the god of war that can be broken down. I'm afraid I can't say it. Therefore, whether it's a big man or a small person, whether it's today or the Ancients, we must first acknowledge that he is a normal person (an exception to Liu ziye's madness, he can't really use "people" to describe him. You don't think that I am yelling at him. If you just Google his story, Everything will be clear.) He has a self-interest idea that everyone has, then it has basic logic reasoning capabilities. On this basis, when reading history, we try our best to reverse the logic of the ancients and then analyze the weak or miscalculated logic.

Here I will use Xiang Yu as an example to illustrate how many valuable ideas have been neglected by a face-based book. Why do I use Xiang Yu? First, of course, because he is very flushed, he is suitable for being an anti-face instructor. Second, because he is not paranoid, he is not as strange as the utility functions of some emperors, it is more important to look at a princess than the rest of the world. Xiang Yu is also ambitious to get the world as his mission.

 

First, is it wrong for Xiang Yu to kill Liu Bang In Hongmen. This seems to have become evidence of Xiang Yu's benevolence, because Liu Bang became the Emperor. However, I did not think it was wrong not to stop Liu Bang when I carefully examined the situation at the time. On the contrary, killing may lead to more trouble. Why? Xiang Yu's 0.4 million largest army, including tens of thousands of hosts, most of which are zhuhou's troops and horses. The only reason why he was able to break down the canonicalized system was that Liu bang's efforts to steal the power of heaven first when the princes and the Qin army fought for a great deer, and tell the old Qin zhongzhong's father the command of Chu Huai Wang to be the king of Guanzhong. So the princes were indignant. But now Liu bangfeng has closed inventory and Yu xi, and is stationed on the overlord to wait for Xiang Yu. At this time, where can Xiang Yu use an excuse to kill Liu Bang in a straightforward manner? According to the current situation, Xiang Yu can completely control Liu Bang. What is necessary to forcibly kill him? If the customer tries to kill the game indiscriminately, even though there is a big problem, the following princes are vulnerable. I am afraid Xiang Yu will not be of any benefit. Xiang Yu will not kill Liu Bang, which is the same as Cao will not kill Liu Bei. It is hard to say a mistake.

Second, Wang Feng's problem. Xiang Yu is not holding a big print in the hero's princes, the king of chaos, and then make a mess in the world of cake, his own death Dongcheng for the world to laugh mentally retarded. We still need to analyze the situation at that time. Grouping is of course the heart of the world. Although Xiang Yu is strong, he did not dare to use his own district to take tens of thousands of soldiers.
And forcibly enforce the county-level system in the world. Otherwise, the sub-princes will turn their guns and start the war change. It is still a problem if he can survive in Guanzhong. Zhou Chao and Qin Dynasties are in Guanzhong, because they have been in Guanzhong. In the late Qin Dynasty, Guanzhong was exhausted, far from being the capital of the King of wany, as Zhuge Liang said. Pengcheng, however, is not, one meets the aspirations of the generals to return home, and the other, pengcheng, according to the world, is the place of the throat of the world, through sanqin, East suppression of Qilu, North resistance of Yan generation, this is also understandable.

Xiang Yu made a lot of effort to achieve the goal of unifying the world. First, let yourself "legal" Occupy the richest 1/4 of the world, and use the seals in his hands to kill the princes (Xiang Yu's usual method is to block a major generals under a certain vassal state, and then migrate the original king to another place as the king, in this way, the new king has a bid for the old king, and the old king is dissatisfied with the new king. Xiang Yu is happy to join each other ), the best way to do this is to weaken Qi guotian, his biggest foreign rival, to divide Qi guotian into three sub-accounts and three sub-accounts, so that they can kill each other because of the location ban, then Xiang Yu took the opportunity to claim the title of Tian Rong and kill Tian Rong, and forced Tian Heng to a small island to survive. Qi is a vassal of the State of Chu. At the same time, Xiang Yu cleverly used Qin's fall to suppress sanqin and block Liu's way out. Here, we can't help but make people complain. This sub-sealing system is really not a good choice!

 

Xiang Yu also has his own personality defects, such as rashly killing yadi and losing the support of the hearts of the people in the world (it is better to be an emperor than to be a monk, and it is also good to put a shelf ). At the same time, there are also many accidental factors. Not to mention anything else, Xiang Yu sent 30 thousand Chu troops to supervise Liu Bang before Liu Bang entered Shu, and his peers also had various princes. The layout was very thorough. Later, the troops of the princes were naturally redeployed back, but until Liu Bang made a decision on sanqin, the whereabouts of the 30 thousand Chu soldiers were no longer found in the history book. If these soldiers can work together with Zhang Yu to promote Xiang Yu to the west, then Liu's dream of the world can only become an empty talk.

I think Zeng guofan's method of reading history books is worth learning from. He said that when reading history books, he had to imagine his experience as if he was interacting with the Ancients. In this way, we can explore the cause and effect of the actions of the ancient people, rather than sticking to the ancient people with a certain established guiding ideology. The scholar will only let the scholar discuss the man and laugh in the book!