Open source and closed source under comments

Why is a basic logic unnecessary when discussing political topics? For example, whether Americans are superior to Chinese people or not-it depends on people.

Which of the following is better for open-source software and closed-source software? Generally, it is better to invest a lot in manpower. Do not think that software is a smart game. Software is a human-invested game, both in development and maintenance. When you copy a duplicate file, you will be asked whether to overwrite the file or not. If there is one less logic, it will only directly report a failure.

Closed-source software and open-source software have their own ways of attracting investment. Closed-source software is driven by commercial interests-because someone buys this software (or related products), I am investing in engineer development. Open-source software is driven by cooperation. Many people in this software need to interface with it. I sell my products through it, at the same time, partners in the ecosystem can develop more updates based on this software to form factual standards. In this way, everyone will put the code upstream in order to reduce the development cost, so as to form a situation where multiple developers can work together. (It is useless to keep the dead software confidential)

The two development modes have different human adsorption capacities in different scenarios. For example, the OpenOffice mentioned previously cannot be used by msoffice because it does not have the cooperation requirements of commercial companies. However, if you say that on the Server OS, there is no other operating system that is growing above Linux, and all of Microsoft's cloud servers are using suselinux. Do not mention the greatness of Unix. UNIX is also losing the market step by step. Because of the long market ecosystem and the need for cooperation, everyone is willing to upload code to reduce their investment in this field.

Back to the question itself, you may think that Chen has more background information to identify. However, there is no nutrition in this sentence.

Open source and closed source under comments