Original glorious False original also not shameful

Yesterday Baidu's official description of the 6.28 incident, which spoke of the standard interpretation of the low quality site. The so-called low quality site refers to: No original, or pseudo original (very little original content, a lot of content or machine generated/modified content); This site is not designed for end users, but only to get traffic from the search engine.

　　

This paragraph mainly explains that Baidu advocates two purposes: one is original, but the user experience. Of course, the two are inseparable, high-quality original content will bring a very good user experience, but to improve the user experience is not necessarily original can be, practical, practical help to the user and cause the user to resonate false original also can improve the user experience. Baidu has been emphasizing the originality of content, but in the existing reality, to have 100% of original content is impossible, the following I enumerate some cases:

First, all medical websites, can not avoid to write some disease articles, and each disease symptoms, etiology and other professional knowledge is only those, if not in this knowledge to expand content, that should how to write? It is impossible to have only one article of this disease on the Internet, and especially some big industry websites, They have all covered a lot of information in the industry, so it is inevitable that we should make false original.

Two, such as Baidu know this kind of question and answer platform, the same problem has many similar questions and answers, many of the content of the answer is also from other professional website to find, may be directly copied, such Web content is not original?

Third, we often publish articles on the classified information website, but these released information is a time limit, to a certain time will be deleted, so we have a lot of information to repeat, but really there is demand, users are more concerned about, that this information will not be punished by Baidu?

Four, if there is a small site, the content of the site is relatively small, but are original, and the use and value are very high, the user attention is very good, I think Baidu will not because these give him a good ranking bar. Of course, if the site continues to do so, and are original, the rankings and traffic is a matter of sooner or later.

We are to encourage the original, but also can not avoid false original, high-quality false original will also improve the user experience. Original is glorious, but false original is not shameful. A lot of seoer will find such a phenomenon, many large weights of the site if the collection of some small site information for false original, it is likely that this information on these large sites become original content and lead to the top, because the site's high weight, influence.

I'm not complaining about this because it's a fact that's already there, and we can't do it because of that. Emphasis on originality is absolutely correct, otherwise we should go to encourage collection? Then what will our online world look like? It could be flooded with junk information. Search engine should be for the ordinary Netizen service, stationmaster should give netizen to provide more valuable thing!

So I do not encourage a large number of other sites to collect content, or even a large number of Web site topics unrelated to the content, or the machine batch generation of worthless pages. This collection is a violation of other people's intellectual property rights, free to steal the work of others behavior. But here I also want to do for those who work hard every day in front of the website editors to edit articles to say a fair word, they collect information on the Internet, integration and add their own things, this false original is not in the manufacture of network garbage. The site needs original content, but the original content is not easy to obtain, so this time appropriate pseudo original is also possible, especially can bring user experience false original article, I think it is worth our affirmation.

All right, let's say here today! These are some of my own personal views, but at the same time also heartfelt. If there are different points of view, welcome to discuss with me, this article from the original http://www.xinxiehe.com, reproduced please indicate the source, thank you!