WF is not a workflow (subsequent)

// Connect to the previous article

Aspnetx said: it provides space for third-party software vendors

A. Z said: WF is the packaging abstraction of a series of processes.

Nostalgia said: the platform and engine are two yards away.

Qu Bin Said: the foundation is not a platform.

Artech said: WF, as its name implies, is the basic structure of a workflow and a workflow engine.

Aspnetx also said: "The password is hidden ."

I 've mentioned a lot before.SummaryNow, you have prepared to write it.SaveThe last sentence

WF's F is a foundation. If it doesn't take two days, compare it with the existing business workflow platform, and list a lot of deficiencies. There is no Form Designer, no user management module .......

Okay. The chat is over. The following is the text.

The concept of WF should be process-oriented,

There is nothing special about this idea. The responsibility chain in the gof design model is a manifestation of this model,
I often use a process control structure in development,
[Let's Talk About workflow-the workflow platform is actually to maintain a set of linked lists in the set]
[Workflow: Xiao Ming and Xiao Qiang are both students of instructor Zhang ......]
Two articlesArticleThe implementation style is commonly used in development,

WF provides an implementation foundation or a group of function libraries for this idea.
In the WF Foundation, we can see the shadows of ORM, IOC, AOP, and SOA. However, WF is not such a large collection, and WF is clearly positioned to implement "process-oriented"

Net3.0 provides three foundations)

One is communication, the other is UI, and the other is why Wf

Communication is the core of the Network Age, and UI is the trump card of ms. WF is the key to be associated with them .............

VB has started the era of visual editing. Will the idea of WF or WF begin in a New Era ......

Digress:
It's also a process designer http://www.cnblogs.com/foundation/articles/602119.html

// End [WF is not a workflow]