What is wrong with the second version? Do you have a look at my translation for the third version?

The original article is as follows:

With the advent of Internet Explorer 5 and the lackluster performance of navigator 6, however, the advantages of form-based applications are clouded. IE 5's consistent and robust support for DHTML allows the programmer to create Web-based applications that are every bit as pretty as their fat client equivalents. of course, such applications necessitate standardizing on IE and not supporting navigator. in each industrial situations, this standardization is now common.

Pay attention to the red sentences. Others are just a language environment.
However, with the advent of Internet Explorer 5 and the poor performance of navigator 6, the advantages of form-based applications are very prominent.
My third-edition translation is:
However, with the advent of ie5 and the decline of navigator 6, the advantages of form-based applications become increasingly less obvious. Internet Explorer 5 provides consistent and comprehensive support for DHTML, allowing programmers to create Web-based applications identical to the original rich client environment. Of course, such applications are necessary and standard in IE, but not supported by navigator. In many industrial situations, standardization is now normal.

I have not read the original version of the second edition, but I think the latest version should not be a major turning point in these terms, so the translation of the second edition should be problematic. The translation is not smooth, and this problem is very difficult for readers.
Again, I want you to see if my translation is correct. In addition, I would like to remind the comrades who are reading the second edition to pay attention to this part.