World, other people's world, my world

Today, I chatted with my friends to find that there are different worlds, and many things I did not even think. Get something:

1. Have I been overestimated by myself and people who have been in touch with different roles in the past?

Is my technology really several times better than others? Although I am confident, at least three years ago I did not. How can other people measure my value? Actually, my ability to solve problems, although some of them are embodied in technology. I have never thought of this. Yes, I get at least twice the salary of a person with a lower rank than I did in my company, my practice, from Requirement Analysis to design ideas to specific implementation, is indeed better than them, but this is not the focus. People don't give me more returns because of this. In the past, I thought it was possible that I had a strong relationship with the boss, but when I thought about the problem carefully, I recalled some details and found that this was not reliable: Our boss told me later, in those years, some large projects were prepared for outsourcing, but after consulting and measurement, I still thought that I was responsible for higher cost effectiveness.

These capabilities are actually created by my growth experience, but I don't fully understand them. It is a very dangerous thing to be unable to recognize the defects in the ability. But if there is something that doesn't realize it, what will happen to me? I cannot think that I am suitable for FPS competitive games because of these capabilities on Q3. It is clear that before entering Q3, I may even feel dizzy with some FPS games, I don't have any talent in this field. Similarly, I shouldn't think that I have a technical talent because of these abilities: In my good learning environment, however, the lack of technical feelings in the most precious period of childhood has denied this possibility. But I still need to be cautious about another possibility: Today's denial is because I am tired of living a poor and happy life. As a result, I have no choice but to do what I can do.

It is a problem where my capabilities are, what they are, how they are used, and how they are used.

2. Why did I dare to do it?

I used to think that it was the first time that I was not afraid of tigers. I was bold. If I put it into a more knowledgeable today, I may make different choices. In fact, it is not: today, my specific methods may change, but I will still adopt the same service strategy. This is actually because I have always been a half-neighborhood, and I have little worries about it. What if I am too big to go home? This is the reason why I can really open my hands and feet. The various choices made by the results often achieve less work, much acquisition, and great self-improvement. In a period of time, a positive feedback is formed. These are not determined by my personal traits or specific mentality, but by a purely economic foundation.

Why do I dare to question the popular methodology? This is because I think that I have time and can spend a lot of energy on any problem. This is actually because I have more reliance on this city than others. When a person has more time than others, of course, he will naturally choose to determine many things on his own, rather than depending on others' public opinions. However, there is something in the beginning that really needs to be considered. Is time really infinite? Maybe it is too slow.

Be cautious.

3. What should I do in the future?

Last year, when my team was close to a group member, a project came to the door and started to talk about 250 K. People were very satisfied with my performance. Later, one of my predecessors taught me that I came out to build a package project company? I was about to quit. Later, people mentioned 350 K. The only requirement was that I personally participated in the incident. As a matter of fact, I decided that the original team would just pull two people out, and I personally participated in the work. The work was completed in half a year. In terms of the production efficiency of our own projects, I am quite confident. However, I did not do it in the end, causing a shortage of resources this year. Another point is that continuous rejection leads to a reduction in social relations and fewer opportunities. Later, I helped my friends with a number of small and many projects, but found that the strategy of small-scale amplification did not save any time for research. This does not mean that the actual workload of this K project is only 35 K, but the goal and requirements of a friend's project are not particularly clear. Although the actual workload is much smaller, the troubles may not be much less; coupled with the interruption of research ideas, small projects and large projects can achieve the same effect of suspending my own things.

Is my selection incorrect? As a matter of fact, it is difficult to make a wrong mistake because of the factors mentioned in 2, but here I ignore some things. What? I once again ignored some of my possible features. Yes, my technology is good because I can always ask questions and give reasonable answers. Technically, it is only an application of my ability. When negotiating with this K project, other people can feel this kind of thing. Is it easy for others to be fooled by me? I'm afraid not. The only one that is not out of the user's actual needs is that I tend to choose. net, but I did not lie. The other party agreed to choose the Microsoft platform, just because of my impression that I was reliable in doing this: I personally want to use 3 ~ Seven people have completed most projects below KB (because of some experience on this scale, but most of them are at least one order of magnitude higher than those on the very early ears ), more importantly, I can transmit this information to customers in some cases. Of course, this is not to say that if you pass it, you will surely be able to take it down. The success rate of 5% for such a thing is quite high.

What do I need to think about, that is, since these are external manifestations of my internal capabilities, do I waste them and let them begin to dust and degrade? In the past two years, I have chosen another way to complete the task with high efficiency and low cost for profit. Now I will go on a completely different path. Of course, money is not the main purpose. This is not the case of B or because of 2. Therefore, it is true that there is a shortage of nerves in this regard, and more is what we hope to do. Is there another way I can't implement myself? It seems that there is still a need to reflect on this, but even if the results still recognize the current path, I still need to wonder whether I have correctly understood myself and my abilities, what are the most appropriate aspects of performance? Are there some specific forms of their performance available on the current path? How can we find opportunities to give play to them? In addition, will the simplification of life and work actually damage the integrity of internal capabilities, weaken itself as a whole, or even affect the progress of ability itself?

1st and 2 questions involve correct understanding of the world. I often think that there are more ways to do this than they are to be difficult, and I am not familiar with the differences and phenomena that I do not know. In fact, the real problem is me. This is basically because my environment has made me a stupid pig that is "standing and talking is not so painful. I mistakenly realized the world of others and the world in which I live. The last question is what my own world looks like, or what it should look like?

Communication is always helpful. Thank you for helping me. From: http://www.cnblogs.com/guaiguai/archive/2008/09/01/1280873.html