Google's latest algorithm-human flesh search engine

It has nothing to do with mop, but as early as last month, I saw in the donews forum that Shang Beijing's buddy invented the human flesh search engine-that is, to manually process each search, send you the most accurate search results by email. At first glance, it seems impossible to complete the task, but think about it as long as there are enough people, because Google is doing this now.

The term trustrank was mentioned in Google's half-official explanation of some issues a few days ago. Trustrank is a patent name recently registered by Google. It is guessed from its name that it is a trust value for a website. It has a high level of trust and a low level of trust for poor character. Then rank based on the trust value. It sounds good. Not only does it sound good, but Google is doing the same.

On the Google recruitment page, there is a job named quality evaluation associate/administrator. Simply put, the job is to use Google every day and pick out junk pages. Some webmasters who analyzed Apache raw log found a reference connection called eval.google.com (that is, someone clicks the website URL of the webmasters on the page where eval.google.com is the host, causing access to the log file ). This is clearly the work of quality evaluation associate/administrator. More than 80% certainly said that all these are preparing for Google trustrank.

What can the trustrank webmaster do?

The first is formal Seo techniques, including (What do you think ):

1. Websites with content
2. Know the requirements of search engines for websites (information provided by Google to website administrators, Baidu and webmasters)
3. Consistent intra-site link policy (see the last question explained by Google's half-official Team)
4. Chinese statements are fluent, English spelling is correct, and punctuation usage Specification
5. It is best to use the XHTML web standard to create a website
6. Clear themes on each page
7. Do not connect to websites with poor personalities
8. Accurate whois information

Second, don't forget that trustrank is followed by a person rather than googlebot, so the website should consider the human factor (in fact, it is nonsense, but now many websites are made for search engines ):

1. Building and maintaining a website with the same values as Google: top ten truths discovered by Google
2. Privacy Policy page (sina's privacy policy page ). Note that the privacy policy is not a form, but a realistic one. For example, if you write a cookie, you need to explain on the page why the cookie is written and how to clear it. If a user needs to register, you need to explain what you are doing with the data, whether the data will be sent to others, and if so. For example, if a visitor can subscribe to the Mail list, you must describe how to unsubscribe, and ensure that the user's email address is not used as a spam email address, etc.
3. Terms of Use Page (Yahoo Terms of Use page ). Like the privacy policy page, the Terms of Use also vary with the website. Users who browse your website must comply with these terms.
4. Do not have SPAM records. For example, if your website has been sending SPAM for a long time and SPAM on the Forum, someone may report SPAM, so some organizations will have records. (SPAM record of a Vietnamese IP: http://www.whois. SC /rbl? Ip = 203.168.222.35)
5. Do not have messy advertisements. This is the most important thing: some crazy websites do not have any content, full screen flying advertisement. There is no problem with clean advertisements such as Adsense and images with fixed positions in healthy content.
6. Do not have any illegal content. websites that provide cracked software, pirated movies, or other content will not have good results.
7. Websites without original content should not exist. TrustRank is too high if your website is full of content reposted from other websites.

There are many more. In fact, the website is for people, not for search engines. Another sentence: Using immoral means to cheat money is an overdraft of the future-an opportunity to overdraw the future, an overdraft of the future, or an overdraft of the freedom of the future.