From "standing on the shoulders of giants" to "kneeling at the foot of the Dwarf" -- self-supplied by the deputy editor of Turing Company (2)

I am planning and editing of "C program design partner". I want to talk about it here. (2)
Author: Chen Bing, Deputy Editor-general of Turing Corporation, people's post and telecommunications Publishing House

 

Some people say that tan haoqiang's books are rubbish, and Spam's companion can only be spam. What I want to say is that the people who say this are not only ignorant, but also shameless. You know, not only is it possible that you learned this book for the first time, but even your teacher probably learned this book for the first time.

[Comment:
This paragraph is very shameless.
First, deputy editor Chen fabricated a "Someone said ...... Only ". Compiling a scarecrow to attack is a rogue style that Chen's deputy editor has always been, which is very vulgar.
In fact, some people have said Tan haoqiang's book spam, and some people have said "companion" spam, but no one has said, "Tan haoqiang's book is very spam. The Spam companion can only be spam ". This sentence was fabricated by Chen Bing. His intention is to put an unreasonable logic on others and attack it, in order to try to deny that tan haoqiang's book and "companion" are very junk.
Second, deputy editor Chen arbitrarily believes that "people who say such things are not only ignorant ". In fact, the ignorant is Chen's deputy editor himself. He simply couldn't see that tan haoqiang's book and companion were rubbish.
Third, deputy editor Chen tries to use the shameless moral attacks such as "and shameless" to conceal the fact that "Tan haoqiang's book is very junk" and "companion" is also very junk.
Fourth, beg for the absurd pseudo-morality. "Not only is it possible that you learned this book for the first time, but even your teacher probably learned this book for the first time ". If a baby drank Sanlu milk for the first time, would he always want to thank Sanlu milk? This logic is obviously shameless. According to this logic, no matter how spam you are first exposed, you will not be able to criticize it in the future. This logic may only be approved by Qj criminals in the prison. Here, Chen Bing tries to lure people out of moral shame (though ridiculous) to replace the technical comments on the two books.
]

In that era, it was not easy for everyone to write such a book. As the first book, no matter how many deficiencies it has, it cannot erase its positive power. I would like to ask how many students who love computer programming can start their programming journey if they didn't have such a book at that time. You need to know that you have programming before you start programming.

[Comment:
Tan haoqiang is not the inventor of C language, nor the only disseminator of C language, or even the earliest introducer and disseminator of C language in China.
The so-called "if you didn't have such a book to read at that time, the school wouldn't even have to open this course" is purely an unknown speaker. Tan haoqiang's "C program design" was published in 1991. Before that, Tan followed other college students to listen to the C language that other teachers taught. Why did he say "the school didn't even open this course "?
Here is a reference (http: // 202.4.153.84/book/queryout. jsp? Type = author & word = % CB % EF % D3 % F1 % B7 % BD), which fully proves the ignorance of the Deputy Editor:
1 C language programming Meng qingchang sun yufang Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 7-313-00042-1 1987 view suo Shu No.
2 C Language and Its Application Meng qingchang sun yufang Yuhang Publishing House 7-80034-062-7 1988 view suo Shu No.
3 C language entry sun yufang zhongcui Hao Science Press 7-03-000543-0 1988 view suo Shu No.
4 C language entry sun yufang zhongcui Hao Science Press 7-03-000543-0 1988 view suo Shu No.
5 UNIX operating system christin Christian Sun Yu Fang Dong Shihai Electronics Industry Press 1986 view suo Shu No.
6 practical C Language Programming Tutorial sun yufang Peking University 1989 view suo Shu No.
Note that these books were published several years before tan Shu. In addition, all these books I have read are not as wrong as those of Tan haoqiang.
]

I learned this book when I went to school. I thought it was hard to understand, although I finally passed the advanced programmer examination (98 years later) after reading this book, I still think this is not an easy-to-understand book, this is why I plan this partner. But it is hard to understand. It does not mean it is rubbish. Because at least one thing, without this book, I would not know that I like computers.

[Comment:
Deputy Editor Chen is interpreting what is the frog at the bottom and watching the sky.
"It is a beautiful lie that" the Senior Programmer examination passed by reading this book "cannot be passed only by reading this book according to the examination syllabus. Here, Chen ice mentioned this to give others an impression that he understands the C language, so that he can comment on the C language book that he does not understand. This is just like he used the title of "MVP" to confuse beginners. Although professionals cannot, they can at least refer to publishers (not all) and ignorant beginners.
"But it's hard to understand. It doesn't mean it's rubbish." Chen's deputy editor-in-chief, the scarecrow, made a great deal of effort. No one said it is spam because it is hard to understand it, but it does not affect the fact that it is spam (http://bbs.chinaunix.net/thread-1686753-1-1.html ).
"Without this book, I will not know that I like computers .", Is it true or false? Is it related to the topic? Deputy Editor Chen planned this book only from his own narrow perspective, and did not consider the needs of the majority of readers. Planning failure is a matter of course.
]

But this book does have problems. At least it makes me difficult to read. I hope it will become easier to understand, I also hope that some questions I have raised when reading this book can be explained and some things behind it.

[Comment:
Many beginners can find a lot of errors in Tan Shu. A "Senior Programmer" can't see it, and there are still many "questions ". It seems that "senior programmers" are the same as MVPs.
Note that these two paragraphs contain at least nine "me" characters, which, from a psychological perspective, shows a psychological state of self-inflation and self-centered.
]

However, this book does not have as many problems as some people think. On the surface, it cannot be simply understood as wrong. Tan haoqiang has not written some things, some things are simplified, and some parts do not comply with industry standards. I think this may not mean that he does not know how to write these things, even if he did not know at first, for more than 20 years, he will be notified of numerous mistakes, I think his simplified or seemingly non-compliant approach to these areas is more about avoiding too many technical details from interfering with the minds of new students who first came into contact with programming in college. You know, this book is intended for new students who graduated from the third year of high school and have just finished their freshman year, so that new and new programmers are entangled in details, it's just as if you want to go to McDonald's KFC and have to wear a suit and tie.

[Comment:
With the foreshadowing of the previous "Senior Programmer", deputy editor Chen began to pretend to be an expert here, deliberately defending the bad books of the male children and defending him at the foot of the dwarf.
As a reflection of Self-inflation and self-centered psychological states in the scope of philosophy or logic, this text is a typical subjective fallacy (subjectivist fallacy ), this means that something is true because you think it is true.
]

At dinner time, as a code farmer, you happily went to McDonald's for dinner in T-shirt shorts. As soon as you entered the door, a hot guy jumped out and said, "Ha, I caught you. Dinner was a dinner and you wore shorts while eating dinner. You are wrong! You are making a mistake! You're done! Folks! !" What can you say? I guess you can only honestly give him 5 cents, and then continue to pay for your hamburger in this out-of-date dining suit.

[Comment:
This is a nondescribable metaphor. It does not need to be a code farmer. Even beginners know that even if the code is wrong with a punctuation mark, compilation fails. Therefore, going to McDonald's for dinner and writing code are totally different. Chen Bing is probably proud of his own metaphor. In fact, all his meals are diners, and they have nothing to do with their profession. Chen ice, a set of people, can only target those with brains.
]

In fact, the main problem with Tan haoqiang's book is to make some simple problems complicated, in some cases where the adoption of industry standards makes it easier for things to understand and clarify their ideas, it is easier to simply handle things in a way that makes things invisible, this leads to more misunderstandings and difficulties in understanding students. There are also some places where, because there is no hidden things behind the scenes, it will also make it difficult for students to understand because the questions that will inevitably arise are not answered.

[Comment:
Not knowledgeable. If Chen Bing really understands C, he will not ask Chen liangqiao to write this book.
This is only an empty argument without arguments. It's just a bit of a bid and a bid. You asked Chen Bing to look for several examples to prove his point of view, so that he could be dumpfounded immediately.
]

I plan this book to solve these problems. It makes life easier for the target readers of this book to read tan haoqiang's book together.

[Comment:
In fact, he is reading the sales volume of Tan haoqiang's book and wants to sell it together with his companion book. This is the real reason why he is kneeling at the foot of the gnome and the wishful thinking during planning. He does not care about the two books.
]

Finally, I want to say that it is impossible for anyone to write any book. If you read from others' books with the wrong mind, what you get from any book can only be wrong, because it's exactly what you're looking.

[Comment:
Well. The logic of deputy editor Chen is that both the big meal and the stool are "big", so he thinks that he should treat the stool with the attitude of treating the big meal.
]

In the final analysis, whether a person writes a book is worth reading is the first factor that determines the attitude of the person writing the book, rather than his level.

[Comment:
This is too many people, right? Cu rating: "against Day "!
What is the attitude of the author of companion? Read this section and you will know.

Do you have to blame him for making mistakes and making a prompt?
]