Gao fushuai and another example of big companies

Since I posted my previous article, I have seen many comments from netizens. Many people agree with the comments, and some people feel that they do not agree. It doesn't matter. Before I start to continue Article 3, I will share some real cases, it may be helpful for understanding the topic of the article.
I once interviewed a software developer and said to myself: I want to create a large project and do not like to do small projects, which does not reflect my value. Q: What kind of big projects? Q: How can we get a million projects. However, when asked technical questions, what is the difference between group by and order! Not clear! I don't understand his logic and values. I can't do anything about it. Is it valuable to do it from the very beginning!
Second, another software technician, who once worked in a company with thousands of people for two years, said that the development department had more than a hundred people, but did not know how to paging the gridview. The reason is that all modules of a large company are encapsulated, and development is basically a pipeline-based job, and what a person does is basically one of the links, without comprehensive processes and core technologies, you cannot develop your own ideas. What a large company wants is that everyone is a screw and everyone can turn away from it. Therefore, after two years, the controls and classes encapsulated by others cannot walk independently without the "crutches. Although the salary is very high, but when I leave that environment, there is basically no difference between a real-world company and many new users. The survival ability of the wild environment is obviously insufficient, and the potential of life is lost.
3. I interviewed a salesperson for two years of sales and asked him what he planned for his career. He replied: I want to have a car and a room within five years! What is your current income? A: The current salary is about 3000, of which the base salary is 2500, and the Commission is more than 300. There is also a subsidy. After listening, I was speechless for half a day. People know that sales rely on commissions to support themselves. For good sales, basic salary can even be ignored. Dare to ask, you have been working for two years. You have made hundreds of RMB in a month, and you have to pay a base salary to make a living sale. your monthly income is only 3000 RMB. In cities like Beijing, what do you rely on? I personally think it is okay to have an ideal, but whether to be practical, whether to think about the gap between my own abilities and goals, and how to improve my own abilities should be planned! Otherwise, planning is just an illusion.
4th: A newly graduated college student came to Beijing to look for a job. I found that many of them came from the gold rush mentality. I couldn't afford it, but I wanted thousands or even thousands of students. I asked him: what is your salary level determined based on? A: in Beijing, the consumption level is high. It is not enough to spend less on housing and meals! (To be honest, I 've heard too many people talk about it many times.) The salary is determined based on the ability and value of the person, not based on your spending, it is your own business to spend enough, not the company should pay you for your expenses. If you want to buy a house in Beijing, do you have to pay 20 thousand yuan? I don't think it should be this logic. An unrealistic impetuous mentality can only be to let yourself lose many opportunities. It is also impossible to get others' values, because you are not worth that price! You may get short-term money and lose long-term opportunities! The principle I have always recommended is to enter with a low profile, and to become a high profile. When your value exceeds others' expectations for you and exceeds your price, some things will naturally come and look farther away. No boss is stupid enough to be willing to lose people who create value for the company. On the contrary, those who fail to meet their own salary values and company expectations are most likely to be cut off by the company! As you can imagine, a person with the same abilities (assuming 5 k) can enter a company, with only a little less, for example, 4 K, and a little more, for example, 6 K, if they do the same thing, you say the company will choose who, who is preferred, and who has more opportunities? For a person with 4 K, he is measured by 4 k standards. He always thinks that he is doing very well and always exceeds the standard. It is easier for others to look at each other and improve their quality. For 6 K people, others will also require you to measure your work by 6 k standards. Every time you feel less than expected, and every time you are not satisfied, you will gradually lose too much. Who will be more likely to develop in the future? I think smart people can understand. The future of a company is definitely not determined by wages, but by others' comments and trust.A competent person can be Nb. However, for some people who cannot install Nb, Nb requires capital! No one is stupid. This is one of the reasons why many people will not be raised!
I don't know if this is an example. After reading these cases, I think you should understand what kind of mentality and social phenomenon it is! We never despise a person's dream. We can all pursue high salaries, big projects, big companies, and rich and handsome jobs. However, to get these ideas, we need to understand why! How to do it!