Graph has data for you to analyze 6.22 and 6.28 Baidu updated K stations

Today, QQ is crazy to be asked by netizens. Many webmaster websites are asking questions about a large number of K stations. In fact, our Hangzhou seo team observed the phenomenon at around last night. At that time, a member of our seo group said that some of our sites were K, and the collection was abnormal, let's take a look at the websites that everyone is responsible. Later, some members reported that something went wrong! At that time, we had a rough conclusion: either our station had a problem, which caused the situation to happen; or Baidu was adjusting, and it was estimated that it would continue in the next few hours, if this happens, others will report the problem.

I comforted everyone in the group at that time. Don't be excited, don't lose: waiting is also a kind of strength.

At the same time, let everyone check Google and search. If other search engines are normal, don't worry; stick to the recovery.

At half past six in the morning, when I woke up, I went to bed. I picked more than 50 sites from all the sites, including customers, our own sites, new sites, and old domain names, there are small sites and large sites, respectively, to check and analyze; among them, more than 10 sites are carefully analyzed, data statistics, comparison and analysis of pre-and post-data, and tracking of relevant details; the other 40 observed Baidu's reaction.

At that time, there were 2nd general conclusions: the customer's site was basically not changed, and there was no impact. The influence of the old site was very small, and the probability of new sites being K and downgrading was very high. Exceptions include: 1. If the site is K, all Baidu entries are 0; 2. If the site is Baidu, the page is lost; 3. If the site is Baidu, the page is normal and the page is lost; 4. The site Baidu indexing is normal, the homepage is normal, and the snapshot is abnormal. 5. The site Baidu indexing is normal, the homepage is normal, and the domain or site is not in place; another very strange situation is that the site query is 0, but direct query of domain names can display results, and there will be rankings at the same time, there will be no ranking at the moment (non-cache, because we have exclusive technology to distinguish)

At, I posted the following general meanings on several long-mixed QQ groups: [June 28, destined to be an unsettled day. Wait for seo forums, QQ groups, and other good scenes where seoer is located ].

 

At 09:15, all seo members of the company attended the meeting and spent 15 minutes arranging three points: 1. It took 30 minutes to check and analyze the websites that each person is responsible. 2. Record the entire process. The discussion meeting will be held in 3 or 30 minutes.

The meeting was held for 2nd times at, where we reported the situation of all the hundreds of sites and made specific details of the situation. The second step was to discuss and analyze the various conjecture factors in detail; step 3: how do we deal with Baidu's big update situation and what should we do later. (Because the details involve internal company information, feathers can only point to this point. In fact, this step should give you some tips to solve the problem ^_^)

Here, feather shares some of our ideas, ideas, and conclusions with you. Maybe there is something wrong with it, and there are immature ideas, just for reference and discussion. [If you have any questions about your site, you can leave a message at the end of the article-domain name + general information, or add my Q358266135. The feathers will take time to answer the question. I have limited energy and try my best to solve it]

Discussion factor 1: space problems.

Many people say that K is a foreign space, which is wrong. According to the information we obtained, the proportion of domestic sites in K is 58%, and that of foreign sites is 42%. If other people do not talk about the situation for the time being, our own websites will be K in both domestic and foreign countries, although the number is small. There is no data or situation to prove that it is intended to block K stations for space IP addresses.

Cause 2: links are linked to each other.

From our analysis, we can see that websites with links are neither K nor K, and even websites with links without links are K. Therefore, the statement of the Internet-based K-station is basically not true.

Discussion factor 3: content quality issues.

It is now very powerful, that is, all the websites whose content quality is low. With regard to this, feather is skeptical. Many websites that have been built by K are indeed not very good, but many websites that have been operated by K are also hard. I think it's just a matter of proportion. It's not an absolute theory.

Cause 4: Domain name time.

In the past three months, the majority of websites are counted by K. The number of old sites is relatively small, not none. I think the time factor is an integral part of the site stability factor, so this cannot be ignored.

Cause 5: excessive optimization.

Other people's stations, feathers are hard to say. At least the websites under the feather seo team are very sure at this point: The websites under K are definitely not over-optimized. We have daily access to seo and O & M every day. Low-level errors such as excessive optimization are unlikely to occur.

Cause 6: industry issues.

The observations of feathers are concentrated on medical sites, Taobao customer sites, small business sites, and some relatively level-1 news sites. At this point, feathers suspect that this update is aimed at these situations, but it has a wide spread. For details, refer to another article I have posted on Baidu official website: "Baidu's adjustments to news sites, medical gaming and beauty devices are named. This is officially published on the Baidu webmaster platform and has certain guidance and credibility.

Cause 7: External link group issue.

This is because it involves a large amount of data and requires a large amount of data. I do not have enough data to prove it is difficult to draw conclusions. Here we only provide one idea, you can perform data tracking and result analysis based on your own situation.

Discuss factor 8 and other search engines.

We observed the situation of Google, Yahoo, Souso, and Sogou on some new sites (new sites within two months). The conclusion is normal! There is a reaction from the wood; so this time it should be the result of Baidu's updates and adjustments, not directly caused by the site itself. Take a screenshot:

 

Discuss factor 9. External chain changes.

As shown in the preceding figure, all the sites are for two months, and the external links are basically in the rising status (or not because the external links are increased too quickly, although our sites have less than a few thousand external links in less than two months), it is not because of changes in the external links that cause the site to be K.

The relationship between factor 10 and factor 6.22 is discussed. Let's take a picture of feather. The following figure shows a chart that randomly selects nearly 0.6 million sites for analysis: