Meng Yan mentioned in his article that AJAX is just a transitional technology. Later, I held Microsoft's expression in another post and predicted that the current Web Standard (Ajax + CSS + (x) HTML) will soon fall. These posts have attracted a lot of interesting debates, such as dlee posts on the Ajax forum. In fact, I am not very interested in the rise and fall of popular technologies, and I am not very enthusiastic about the dazzling advanced tools, but these posts have triggered a 1.0 broken idea. I am still a believer in Frederick Brooks and suspect that these tools can increase productivity even by 15%. For me, expression is the current development tool, just like Nikon d2x to dummies: no difference. I only use the "Auto" option on the camera. A High-Level camera, a good manual, cannot help me make a picture, help me get the scene, help me bring up the dreamy light that makes people breathe and pause, help me capture the immortal moment in a quiet environment, because even if I am familiar with the manual, I only know how to use the camera, not to mention photography. Similarly, even if I develop an expression independently in my half-Left right brain, the interface I made with it can make my three-year-old nephew have a nightmare night and never recognize me. On the other hand, for the interface design experts, expression is just a waste of time. If expression is used, the texture adding operation is reduced from 3 hours to 30 minutes, and we can move the mouse to generate beautiful animations... But so what? Photoshop did not make my art blind as a qualified artist, nor did it turn any craftsman into a master. I can't see which interface designer can use expression to replace it. N becomes the next Jonathan Ive at night ,. It cannot be seen that expression is used. The old man responsible for implementing interface interaction can immediately let Romain guy lose his job. Even if expression can perfectly generate various types of user interface interaction code, "completely separated from the background business logic" is not a big deal to grab the eggs. The bottleneck of interface design and implementation is not the operation of the artist or the interaction code between interface components. This is not part of the core competitiveness. Besides, I can't see the negative impact of expression on our programmers. The process we developed is to collect requirements and make design sketches. The Media Design Department and user experience Department design the interface based on the sketch and provide the interface code. We Convert static code to dynamic code based on the interface. If expression is used, it means that the Media Department is less complicated and less boring code. There are so many reasons above, but I just want to say that even if Microsoft's ria technology swept across the IT industry tomorrow, I will thoroughly flip Ajax + CSS + (x) HTML, old people immersed in Web Technology for many years do not need to be nervous. The core technologies you have learned will not be outdated. You still need to know what kind of font combination is the most pleasing to the eye, what kind of page organization is simple and practical, and what rules the client and service segment communicate with, how can we write simple and efficient programs, which interaction method can meet the customer's needs... As long as you master and use these skills, you still need a highly developed right brain. You don't have to worry about your years of hard work. True professional skills are integrated into our intuition, immersed in our spirit, entangled in our blood, will not be outdated. Obsolete operations are trivial operations that can be completely encapsulated. We embrace advanced tools and let those trivial operations go out of date. For example, the butterfly's larvae finally grow wings and break through the upper case. It is shown in front of it, the sun is shining, the fragrance of flowers, it can fly freely wide world.
