How much money can make people regain their ideals

Recently I have seen two articles at the same time:

First, it is about job satisfaction.

The book says: for poor people (such as below the poverty line), salary has a decisive impact on job satisfaction and overall well-being.

However, once a comfortable living standard (about $40000 a year in the United States, of course, is related to the region and family size), this relationship does not exist.

-- 77 pages of organizational behavior.

 

First, stick to the ideal.

Mr. Ding Li, the author of the book "geographic strategy", spent six years writing his first book. During this time, the author quit his work and did not receive any financial assistance. His life was very poor, basically, it relies on day-to-day work.

Both physical and financial conditions are poor. However, the author finally persisted and completed the Big Book "geographic strategy.

The quality of books is admirable for the author's spirit of sticking to his own ideals because he has not yet read the books.

Mr. Ding Li graduated from Nanjing University. From the perspective of books, his mind is extremely agile and his life is normal.

Mr. Dante apparently gave up on this dimension.

-- See the preface of "Geo-big strategy"

 

The reason for putting these two articles together is to discuss a topic: How much money can make people regain their ideals.

There is a specific subjective pursuit and action, rather than simply considering whether to make money or not.

 

Mr. Ding is admirable, but it may be difficult for most people.

Money is not ideal, but it can ruin people's enthusiasm for it.

 

On the whole, we still know the etiquette after warehouse preparation.

The key issue is how much warehouse actually needs.

 

I feel that when job satisfaction is not supported by money, it is a clear signal.

 

At this time, money is not the only driver, and the person will find something he is willing to do, so this income value is similar to the value that people are willing to regain the ideal level.

 

Of course, this issue is hard to be accurate. It is important to pay for the amount of money a pig gives, so it will not consider the ideal.

 

This value is about $40 thousand USD/year in the United States. From the original article, it should be in the unit of family, with about RMB 0.25 million.

 

I chatted with people around me, and combined with the surrounding situations, I felt that in China, this revenue value is about 0.2 million every year (the family of three), almost the same as in the United States.

It is estimated that the number of cities in North China will go up to 0.3 million, and the number of prefecture-level cities will be lower than 0.2 million.

People who read this article can feel this question and I am curious about other people's ideas.

 

 

This value has other meanings.

From the perspective of economic goals, do not keep an eye on GDP. How many people have reached this income level is a key indicator.

So that more people can be financially free, and they can live as they wish. Is it more hopeful than dragging all people to the eyes of the country.

At this time, as a country, it will be able to develop a stronger comprehensive force. Otherwise, what is the hope of the country in the eyes of money.