I got up late and thought of it.

It is determined by the specific conditions that the old saying cloud "will not be given permissions to others", even though there are Organization regulations in the work field. As the project owner, I have formulated a work specification to ensure the smooth development of the project, which sets some requirements in daily work and life, including work schedule and so on. This specification was discussed in the entire project group and was unanimously recognized by everyone. That is to say, I did not impose my will on everyone. This is also counted as a collective will. Of course, the entire specification is binding on everyone. According to the regulations, you must go to work at the place before am. You will be fined three days for being late and go to work as usual on Saturday.
Yesterday was Saturday. Because of the tiredness, I woke up late and woke up. When I think about Saturday, it should be a special day. It doesn't matter if I get up a little late. Almost everyone got up at this time and it was almost nine o'clock when they got to the office. When I got to the office, I said, "It may be a little late on Saturday .". However, I felt that I had made several serious mistakes.
1. The exception on Saturday was not taken into account during the formulation of regulations, or there was no provision for special circumstances, resulting in execution deviation.
2. When the new specification was just implemented, the implementation of the Specification was changed at will, affecting the authority of the Specification. In fact, I think I myself want to hide my inversions. I proposed and implemented the rules after discussion. However, the next day I violated these rules. This affects my authority, so I said, "It can be a little late on Saturday ." In this case. However, my changes not only hurt the newly implemented norms, but also caused injustice. As I said earlier, since it was approved by the collective discussion, it should be a collective will. Any violation violates the collective will. Therefore, my words should also hurt the collective will. Because I am the project owner, I think if I want to execute "Saturday can be a little late ." I don't think everyone can express anything in their mouths, but I think they will have a lot of resistance in their hearts. From this, I think that the origin of injustice may be due to this. In history or in our real life, every institution or group has regulations that represent their own will. Maybe these regulations were fair at the beginning, but they are far from perfect, leaders of organizations or groups may also make mistakes and violate the rules set forth at the beginning. I think they should have some psychological activities like mine. However, I am a little bit loose, and they may be at a high level, so the battle in my heart should be more intense than me, and the impact of their violations should be more serious than me. I think the final result is either that they have received the prescribed penalty, or that they have changed the rule just like me. I think the result is that, if such a thing continues to happen, the provision will not be the original provision, and the phenomenon of injustice will become more and more. The final provision will be a blank piece of white paper. The rule is dead, and the collective will is also dead.
3. As we mentioned above, everyone has violated the "must go to work at work place before am" rule. So how can we punish the collective in the case of such a situation? Is it true that everyone has been sweeping the floor for three days? I chose to sweep the floor for three days. In my opinion, if a group foul occurs, the responsible person should be the collective leader, not every member.
This is a typical problem I encountered in the project management process. May others see this article Article You can think about and benefit from it.