I made a little game of Flying chess.

After four days (except for the normal working hours during the day), I finally made the Flying chess project with a free online video. Download the game Please click http://wjh.lkbxw.com/htm/soft/softDetail.aspx? IID = 31

The teacher spoke really well. Step by step, he followed his mind and explained the thought process. "What effect do I want and how do I do it.

However, haha, it's just "not", but it's just a little bit of shrimp? It means "but". Haha, I am too busy. I don't have time to watch all the videos. (The teacher has to take care of most of them.) Haha, so I am accelerating the playback speed. Generally, I want to speed up to 150% ~ Between 200%, sometimes skipped ...... (Time is too short, there is no way, and you have no time to read it ).

My opinion is that I followed the teacher's method to code a little bit, but instead bound my "method" (here it refers to the term "Method" in the Program), so I have read about it, write your own "methods" based on your own thinking ".

I think the most difficult and time-consuming part of my mind is to "suspend a player once", which consumes two nights, the last time I went to play at, I had to say something: a programmer must have a strong body! Because the framework and video of the game I implemented are too different and have different structures, I found the implementation method of this section by the teacher, I can't implement it in my program, so I have to renew it myself! For example, if I want to pause Player A for one time, And I modify the code repeatedly, I can even let player a throw two retries, speechless ...... Shuangliu tears! I am so angry that I have all the words! Exaggerated, and the eyes are tired ......

In fact, in order to take care of beginners, the teacher has used an easy-to-understand method to throw a and B, that is:

Do {

// Player A throws

[Code]

// Player B throws

[Code]

} While (true); is to execute the rollback process of a and B in sequence in the code, it's easy to understand, but one drawback I see is that there are a lot of [Code] blocks under the throws of Player A and player B and there are repeated code (besides the key points, after all, others only need to change the characters a and B), but it is because of the exchange of A and B, so the writing method cannot be reused (this is my personal understanding ).

I just learned about the out parameters section and thought that I could use the out parameter to pass multiple parameters to solve this problem. (The method A and B throw the limit to write one, pass A or B using the parameter passing method, and the number of outgoing POINTS OF THE out parameter is:

/// <Summary>
/// Throttling Method
/// </Summary>
/// <Param name = "p"> only values A and B can be received. </param>
/// <Param name = "dincevalue"> The out parameter transmits a value to the outside. The dincevalue must be defined first. | Number of throws thrown by the throw operator </param>
Private Static void dince (char P, out int dincevalue)
{

}

In this way, you only need to call this method to throw A or B. Saves all the code in the main function.

Of course, after using my own thinking, I will still read the video from instructor su kun again. I think this method will get twice the result with half the effort. The benefits:

1. It will not be framed by others' thoughts;

2. enhanced the level of code writing by yourself (first writing with your own thinking without looking at others );

3. After making the video on your own, watch the video again (and never miss the teacher's video !!), There will be a big framework and problems in my mind, and I can compare myself and my teacher's advantages and disadvantages a little bit, or the teacher's "method" will be better than I thought;

----------------------------

I read the code in the video again, and found that the teacher overwrote the code for throwing the dice at the end: I used the Action Method for reuse. How can I obtain the name of the other party, the teacher used a very superb method:

Some students on the site said that they should use the if statement, that is, if I am 0, then the other party is 1, else if I am 1, then the other party is 0;

The method I want is the ternary operator playerpos = (playerpos [0] = 0 )? '1': '0 ';

However, the teacher used a very clever method and used only one statement: playnumber = 1-playnumber. // If the operator is 0, the operator is 1, the operator is 1, and the operator is 0.

High, it's too high!

Program = structure + algorithm, everything is simple!

This is also one of the differences between 3 K programmers and 3 W programmers?