It may be that csdn has just finished gathering and has not seen any reports about Google PinYin Input Method Using Sohu lexicon.
I am not using the Pinyin input method, so I have not verified the facts, but from the official Google statement, it seems that there is indeed something. but now, it is unknown how Sohu treats Google, which has already apologized, but with the theory of regular, people have apologized and changed their word library, it is enough to give a face, and, sohu also promoted himself to the end.
When Google launched the Pinyin input method just a few days ago, there were n more praises and N more flowers, but now this is happening, another group of people is more than N, and more than N are disappointed.
Disappointed. Indeed, I am also a little disappointed.
However, I also think that this incident happened to Google in China and there was no big fuss. google in China only borrowed its reputation in the United States, but did things in China and invited people in our own country. in China's IT technology field, it is very common for copy-> paste. as small as the blog we post is randomly reproduced, but it does not indicate the source, or even impersonates the author, then, just pull it.Source codeAfter the change, a project is completed, and a 63 project is completed, namely, any core is obtained, polished, or polished, to defraud the national R & D fund.
We have fallen together, and our fall has started from education. This fall has gone deep into the bone marrow, and it doesn't matter even if we just scrape it up.
Yesterday, I saw a note on csdn, saying that I want to ask in person to open it again: How do I deal with developers? Is it dismissal or something else?
I think this person is really boring and poisonous. How does Google handle it? It's Google's own business. Do you have to worry about it.
On the contrary, I think Google should not dismiss the developer of the software because:
1. The incident has come out, and it does not help much to solve the problem;
2. With the current situation of domestic developers, it is difficult to ensure that such ideas are not made and such mistakes are not made even if new recruits are recruited;
3. Google should make good use of this matter to enhance copyright awareness training for technical staff in the company, and give developers a chance to truly learn how to respect their profession and respect their peers, gradually develop a good "R & D world view ".
There are indeed many cool people in Google, but the most important thing is not how many cool people there are, but what kind of behavior they are influencing the industry. as a member of Google, we should cherish Google's reputation more.
In this case, I can think of it as a very normal thing in Google's "Chinese" process, but I don't want to see more Google-related reports like this, at that time, it was really disappointing.