I'm telling you not to.

Describe

Today, I want to take a few minutes to speak with you-directly and clearly-about ebola:what we ' re doing about it, and WHA t need to know. Because meeting a public health challenge like this isn ' t just a job for government. All of Us-citizens, leaders, the media-have a responsibility and a role to play. This was a serious disease, but we can ' t give on to hysteria or fear-because that only makes it harder to get people the AC Curate information they need. We have been guided by the science. We have to remember the basic facts.

First, what we ' re seeing are not a "outbreak" or an "epidemic" of Ebola in America. We ' re a nation of more than million people. To date, we ' ve seen three cases of Ebola diagnosed Here-the mans who contracted the disease in Liberia, came here and sadly died The courageous nurses who were infected while they were treating him. Our thoughts and our prayers is with them, and we ' re doing everything we can-give them the best care possible.

Now, even one infection is too many. At the same time, we had to keep this in perspective. As our public health experts point out, every year thousands of Americans die from the flu.

Second, Ebola is actually a difficult disease to catch. It ' s not transmitted through the air like the flu. You cannot get it from the just riding on a plane or a bus. The only-to-a person can contract the disease are by coming to direct contact with the bodily fluids of somebody wh O is already showing symptoms. I ' ve met and hugged some of the doctors and nurses who ' ve treated Ebola patients. I ' ve met with a Ebola patient who recovered, right in the Oval Office.

And I ' M fine.

The lucky number is the stroke of title;

Third, we know how to fight this disease. We know the protocols. And we know that if they ' re followed, they work. So far, five Americans who got infected and Ebola in West Africa has been brought back to the same states-and all five There are been treated safely, without infecting healthcare workers.

And this week, at my direction, we ' re stepping to our efforts. Additional CDC Personnel is on the scene in Dallas and Cleveland. We ' re working quickly to track and monitor anyone The WHO may has been in close contact with someone showing symptoms. We ' re sharing lessons learned so other hospitals don ' t repeat the mistakes of that happened in Dallas. The CDC ' s new Ebola rapid response teams would deploy quickly to help hospitals implement the right protocols. New screening measures is now on place at airports this receive nearly all passengers arriving from Liberia, Guinea and S Ierra Leone. And we ' ll continue to constantly review our measures, and update them as needed, to make sure we ' re doing everything we CA N to keep Americans safe.

Finally, we can ' t just cut ourselves off from the West Africa, where this disease is raging. Our medical experts tell us, the best-of-the-disease is-to stop it source-before it spreads even wide R and becomes even more difficult to contain. Trying to seal off a entire region of the world-if so were even possible-could actually make the situation worse. It would make it harder to move the health workers and supplies back and forth. Experience shows that it could also cause people in the affected region to change their travel, to evade screening, and MA Ke the disease even harder to track.

So the States would continue to help leads the global response in West Africa. Because if we want to protect Americans from Ebola here at home and we have to end it over there. And as our civilian and military personnel serve in the region, their safety and health would remain a top priority.

As I ' ve said before, fighting this disease would take time. Before this was over, we could see more isolated cases here in America. But we know how to wage this fight. And if we take the steps that is necessary, if we ' re guided by the science-the facts, not fear-then I am absolutely confi Dent that we can prevent a serious outbreak here in the the the same states, and we can continue to leads the world in this Urgen T effort.

So here's the problem that if I give you II numbers you should give me the plus of three numbers (the numbers less tha n the number of int) Puls Lucky number)

Input

You'll be given, numbers in the

input
(where the NUM is belong to the integer)
Multiple sets of test data, end with EOF

and the lucky number in the article

Output

Please

read the problem seriously

Sample input

1 11-4

Sample output

2520

Tips

hen jian dan xiang Xin wo
Jiu wo bu keng.

1 ImportJava.util.Scanner;2 3  Public classMain {4      Public Static voidMain (string[] args) {5Scanner scanner=NewScanner (system.in);6         intA;7         intb;8         9          while(Scanner.hasnext ()) {TenA=scanner.nextint (); Oneb=scanner.nextint (); A              -System.out.println (23+a+b); -         }  the     }  -}

I'm telling you not to.