Christmas Eve-bao litong PK pride! Polycom, a foreign company in the United States, and a leader in audio and video conferencing equipment, after two rounds of written tests, today, we finally ushered in the first round of interviews in four rounds of interviews. pk: two technical department managers, 1 HR manager, 1 hr assistant, and 9 interviewers. I feel pretty good. Two experienced Moto, Ericsson, tsinghua, the Chinese Emy of sciences, and Beihang, who practice in France Telecom, most of the jobs in beiyou are basically communication and computer majors. Only those who have work experience and I am a professional in mechanical and electrical fields. I am relaxed, adjust the atmosphere in a circle, the left hand thumb was covered by others, his right hand covered with others' thumb HR tells a story, hear 3 grasp others' hand even if the circle is successful, massage each other closed eyes, HR tells us a wonderful view on the beach... I feel that this is mainly for relaxation. Facing the next interview with a good mental state should not have any impact on the score. I like hr very much, and it is helpful for you to show yourself. Ii. Bao litong publicity film, introduction of Chinese and English HR first ask who knows Bao litong, China, products, and Technical Director about some job problems, be prepared to get a good impression at this step. This step mainly introduces the industry status products of poly Tong. I don't feel like listening, but I still need to record the important information. It may be helpful for the following interview. Even if it doesn't help, this kind of habit of recording while listening can also be seen by the interviewer. In short, strive for a good impression. 3. Take turns to introduce myself. About 2 minutes in English. I want to introduce my academic background in terms of my academic performance and major, followed by my project experience, including the subject and project, as well as the internship experience; then the advantage of personality and hobbies; and finally the ability to sum up and express confidence. People are being inspected at any stage of the group. When others introduce themselves, they should be good at listening and recording well. good at listening is also a respect for others, it is a response to good communication skills. At the same time, we know ourselves and know ourselves. We record the advantages and disadvantages of each person so that we can evaluate others later. A friend may have no confidence in English. He asked me to introduce himself in Chinese and said that he was not prepared. Then, HR said that he would express your Chinese self-introduction in English, but the buddy said that he was afraid of unclear expression and still used Chinese. I think that the old man's strategy is wrong. Even if the English language is worse, it is better to use Chinese characters in this case, and it seems that he has no courage or confidence. 4. group discussions on developing new products for the new project team (1) What is the project vision? (2) how to realize this project vision? (3) Where are the key factors? (4) How is the division of labor? Form: five-minute personal preparation time for each person, 25-minute group discussion time, and 10-minute summary time. Step 4: After the discussion, I first put forward a market analysis survey on the Project VISION. Only by determining the requirements can we determine the objectives and final vision. Don't say too much by yourself, and give others the opportunity to show. Then the other brothers spoke. During this period, a friend proposed timing and determined whether the discussion plan was to allow everyone to take turns to speak or to gradually discuss them according to the four articles. Finally, he decided to discuss them one by one. Pay attention to the performance of each person in the interview and whether they have made outstanding contributions, so that they can be evaluated later. During this period, another friend put forward a record. A good opinion is very important. Everyone has a lot of opinions. If there is no record, it would be hard to summarize it. I took the initiative to undertake this task, but considering that if the record is incomplete, the final statement is unclear and the responsibility will be here for me, I will put forward two people to record it, so that I can remember it more completely, spread risks. After other people made their preliminary comments on the second article, I promptly affirmed others' opinions and added my own ideas. Other students then made speeches. As we talked a lot and spent a lot of time, I finally summarized the second article on the basis of the discussion, if you do not have any comments on my summary, can you start the next discussion and agree to the next one. The key factor is that a buddy first gave his opinion and analyzed technology, capital, time, and management. I think this is quite good, he immediately affirmed his opinion, and then talked about the constraints between technical risks and the project cycle. If you are sure that others are sure of yourself, you must establish a good team style. You can supplement others' opinions, but do not deny others. in a timely manner, you must affirm that others are conducive to pulling votes in the future, who did not choose people who once appreciated themselves? After Others spoke, I asked the timer staff about the remaining time, which was only 4 minutes left. I didn't propose much time. If you don't have any comments, could you have a last discussion, no problem, or the last one. The division of labor, which is shared by all people. From the project manager, system architecture, communication with the customer, hardware related, software related including driver, middle layer, Gui, protocol, etc., testing and QA. I propose to assign tasks reasonably based on the professional advantages of each person and the characteristics of each person, so as to maximize the role of each person and contribute to the team. Since I recorded everyone's information, including major, school, work experience, and project experience, it is easier to allocate people. The final time is limited. Only the personnel requirements are determined and not specific to everyone. The second step is the summary statement considering that it is difficult for me to make a summary statement by myself, for fear of messing up things. Before the discussion is over, I communicated with another record engineer and wanted to make a statement by Division of Labor. His first two parts, I am not sure about the last two parts, but I am not sure about the record in the second part. I will give you more opportunities to present our summary in a more reasonable manner, is there anyone willing to make a summary in the second part? A buddy is brave enough to help me out? haha, but he is also trying to win the opportunity of performance. The third part is fully recorded, I have summarized the fourth part. I said that if no one is willing to summarize it, I will summarize it. The result is of course my chance. As long as there is no major error, of course, it is the best. I think the summary of the three and four parts is okay, but the organization of the fourth part should be clearer. After the conclusion of the four parts to be improved, some friends added a bit, in this way, the third step of team evaluation and personal evaluation will end with HR asking everyone to score the team and their performance. The score is 10 points out. I am not the first speaker, first, I beat the team by 8.5, and I beat the team by 8.8. He is another recorder and has a good performance, but I feel that I have exceeded the team. The score is not suitable for the reason. You cannot give it as you like. At this time, the previous observations and summaries will be used to make full use of the score. Therefore, if there is a record in each link, at this time, it is better to find the third reason for me. With the reference of the first two people, I have a bottom in my mind and Team 9. What makes my own 8.5team do badly is that there was no timer at the beginning, this is a serious mistake. Although the process was not clearly discussed at the beginning of the timing, it led to a waste of time. At the end of the time, no one offered to make a record, although I did a good job in my own team, I finally discussed the results within the specified time. The team members basically played their roles, offered suggestions, and humbly accepted others' opinions, there was no chance to compete for a speech. The team had a good atmosphere and he expressed his views in every step. He actively participated in the discussion. On the second and third questions, A reasonable grasp of the time, promoted the orderly and timely discussion; and was responsible for recording and summarizing the last two parts, and played its role in the team. The disadvantage is that not every stage has a wonderful performance or point of view. In this process, I also recorded other people's scores on the team and their own and their reasons, which is conducive to further grasping the advantages and disadvantages of each person and their performance. Always remember that more information is always better. The process you recorded is visible to HR, and these are the points to be added, because you have demonstrated the quality of listening. Step 4: mutual evaluation. The final step is that everyone selects a person who thinks that he is doing well and is willing to become a colleague. The first one is another person who makes a record. brother, he voted for me because I participated actively and contributed to every step. The second brother also voted for me because I actively expressed my opinion, I promoted the entire discussion, mainly referring to the time control and grasp of the discussion process. Third, myself, I first affirmed the performance of the second brother on the third question, he thinks that he has contributed to the team and remembers that it is no harm to praise others. I chose my first brother because he had a strong professional background, a famous school named XXX, and working experience. These are his advantages; in addition, judging from the performance of the discussion today, he has participated in the discussion record summary and so on. The key is that he proposed timing and the determination of the discussion process in two areas where the team is not performing well, great contributions to the success of the team. I felt that my reasons were quite adequate. I introduced what I recorded in the phase and played a role at this time. In addition, the Project Discussion also recorded the good performance and shortcomings of everyone in a timely manner. The fourth person still chose me. He sat next to me, and he could see everything I did. The reason was that I kept recording things, whether it was a promotional film or self-introductions, he said that this style is quite good, and the work is rigorous and careful. The fifth chooses the eighth option, but does not remember the reason. The sixth option selects the fourth option, because he is steadfast and hard-working. The seventh option is me, the reason is that I have been actively involved in various stages. In addition, I am good at English and have good professional skills. I can help him at work. I chose the fifth place in the eighth place, the reason is that I like his character. I really don't understand it. The fifth brother has a little shy and does not speak much. Maybe it is good for R & D personnel. I really don't understand it, but I felt less likely. The last brother was very direct and there was no reason. The team's choice was his choice. HR understood what he meant and put it under my name. In the final result, I had five votes and four more people and one vote. Finally, HR simply commented that the overall performance was still good and the task was completed. If you want to comment on everyone, HR is inconvenient. If you want to talk about everyone's shortcomings, it is inconvenient. If you are interested, you can discuss them separately. Finally, you asked, the entire recruitment plan and process ended the interview. 5. Conclusion: I finally got a five-vote affirmation. The first PK In My Life surpassed my expectation. I don't know whether it is good or bad, after all, there is a lot of difference between HR and us, but in general I didn't compete for opportunities with others. The atmosphere of the team is still good, but it is not aggressive, this is the most important experience as a whole: 1. Each link records the corresponding information, including listening carefully when others introduce themselves, in addition, this shows good communication skills. 2. Seize the opportunity, affirm others' contributions in a timely manner, and add your own opinions so that you can leave your friends alone. Otherwise, the mutual evaluation phase will suffer losses. 3. Timing, recording, and determining the discussion process can reflect the overall situation of a person. If the team can be promptly proposed when the team is in chaos, it will increase in color. If it was proposed at the very beginning, this role would not be obvious. 4. People who make records can also make appropriate speeches and make concluding remarks. There are many overall performance opportunities and a high probability of success. Therefore, we must seize this opportunity. 5. During the discussion, you should keep in mind the highlights and contributions of each person in time, so as to provide a basis for who chooses who will be eliminated in the final stage. I need to improve myself. The ability to sum up should be further strengthened. In my life, I have a low profile and few speeches. In the future, I will seize this opportunity: sailor_foreverdec 25,200 7.
