[Lecture notes] How to successfully contribute to the International Journal of Science at the National Jiao Tong University

Author: gnuhpc
Source: http://www.cnblogs.com/gnuhpc/

1. Vice president Xu Qianyi talked about some experiences and experiences
1) some editors are reject once they see articles from Taiwan and China.
2) The accept rate of journal is about 10% or lower.
3) academic talents must post articles and actively participate in review.
4) through the seminar, we will know some top academic laboratories, professors, and Editors: ask questions and exchange

Business cards, invitations to the school, and presentations.
5) Self-written articles can polish the language for some editing offices, making the language closer.

In native speaker.

2. Edit Elsevier
Trend:

• Globalisation: it was originally a dominant position in Europe and America and is now on the rise of Asia.
• Rationalisation: focuses on the influence of each article, the actual effect of each article, and the quality rather than the quantity.
• If a journal's article reference is unsatisfactory, it will raise the bar for publishing.
• Focus on originality, the advancement of fields, appropriate methods, reasonable conclusions, and rich data. The language should be fully readable (Language and readability ).

How to Choose journal?

Objectives and scope of Journals-websites and recent articles
Classification and style of articles
Reader identity
Recent journal hotspots
Obtain the scriptures from posted colleagues

A good article structure is helpful for search engine search and further improves the popularity and reference rate of this paper. How to write a thesis:

• The thesis is concise, accurate, and attractive. Do not use unnecessary terms or abbreviations, or use details. Give yourself an English name and keep using it.
• Abstract: It must be independent and never use difficult terms. No reference is required.
• Keywords to avoid uncommon abbreviations and generalized concepts.
• Introduction: the necessary background information, the goals and significance of the current work, the work of the predecessors, your work and achievements. Sets the scenario, raises questions and assumptions, ensures the relevance and timeliness of the thesis in the field, and defines all non-standard abbreviations and terms. Do not write an overview of this field to show off that you have read all the books in this field-write only relevant books, do not intentionally bypass ideas that conflict with you by simply providing support for your work and research. Do not describe specific methods, results, and conclusions in the last section. Do not use novel or for the first time.
• Method: give sufficient information so that the reader can reproduce the experiment. The past tense is used in the tense unless the essay of the methodology type uses the current tense.
• Result: The data is summarized in charts, statistical analysis data is provided, and comparative analysis is performed. However, do not use charts that can be summarized in text to display the results easily, especially when there is too much data, you only need to display the relevant data.
• Discussion: explain how your results are associated with the purpose of the study and assumptions, and other studies, and explain all conclusions that can explain your results, as well as the limitations of this study. Do not write ideas without data support, or introduce new terms and results.
• Conclusion: placing your research in the context explains the advancement of this research in this field, and provides possible future work and experiments. Do not repeat other chapters, or emphasize the impact of your research. This part is definitely different from introduction.
• Acknowledgements: people who provide you with materials or lab conditions, who help you modify your English papers, or who have given you important guidance. Ask their permission and mention your affiliated funding, including the relevant numbers.
• Reference: translate references from other languages. Do not reference your own articles too much or reference the journal you contributed.

Reason for rejection:

The domain or scope does not match (the biggest reason)-You do not have to find top matches.
The article itself (not a language but a structure) is hard to understand-not every native speaker can change scientific papers.
No association is specified. (Importance and significance are not pointed out)
Not original
Incorrect format
The method or result is partially incorrect (the data is incorrect or the data does not indicate the problem)
Lack of context (not pointing out what has been done by others)
Balance of editing (publishing needs)

Cover Letter: this is an opportunity for you to directly talk to the editors. It is short but important to convey the importance of your article to this journal, and it is recommended to have a potential reviewer.
Edited Name:
My questions, author list, and Journal name.
Research Fields and records
The main findings of your research
Significance of your research
Confirm the originality of your research, and there will be no further troubles in the future.

Who will judge your article:
In fact, it's almost the same as you. At the end of the editor, reviewer will read your lines of text. They all work out of the profession, so they are very busy ......

Revision: politely reply to all the points pointed out, especially those you disagree. Are you sure you can see that you are replying in detail one by one, using the page number, number of lines, and different fonts.

In the face of rejection: Try to find out why I was rejected and don't invest in the same journal any more. I can make a thorough and fundamental change and try again, because editing may be in the same room or the same person.

Things that cannot be done:
Do not make multiple comments in one draft, because it will waste the time of the reviewer. The reviewer may be one. Once a single draft is found, multiple comments will be shot immediately.
Do not try to complete a paper with some minor parameter changes, because it is not a complete paper at all.
Conference papers: some of the papers published on proceedings can be published in Journal, but the situation should be explained.
How to rewrite: you cannot copy the words in a sentence, even if the source is indicated.

Q &:
1. rejection rate: it is not published because it is a variable. It may only increase when too many complaints are made, and it has no decisive relationship with the impact factor.
2. Review time: if there is still no response within 10 weeks, you can send a letter to ask.

 

Author: gnuhpc
Source: http://www.cnblogs.com/gnuhpc/