Let's take a look at the "answers to the old zhao interview questions (I)" and post the comments.

The day before, I posted an article titled "answers to the questions of Lao Zhao interview (I)". I couldn't help but think about some things.

The article I wrote the day before yesterday did not expect that there were so many comments. There were always a few comments that looked quite uncomfortable. I think of a previous instructor who said, "Even if this class brings you a piece of inspiration, you are not white ". I can't imagine it.ArticleWhat is so embarrassing? Just give a glance. If you are not interested in such a theory, you can leave and do what you think is important. You also want to scold me for a question. Do you want to prove anything? I remember hearing from a friend that there are some phenomena in domestic forums, that is, some people don't come up with some points to discuss with you, but they are jealous of you. It seems that the more fierce you are, the more cool you are. Are the results scolded? Some questions do not have a standard answer. Do you have any ideas? Do I have any ideas that can be discussed together to prove my point of view through sufficient arguments? In the spirit of mutual progress. In addition to hurting people, such as debating contests, personal attacks undermine rules. I hope that my friends in the garden will discuss the issue with an open and sincere attitude. I want to delete comments that treat cursing people, and my brother has no time to scold you. This makes no sense.

Another point to declare is that the article is just a question of Lao Zhao's interview question. I gave the link to Lao Zhao's article above. I don't think anyone may have read this article, so I began to comment on Lao Zhao's interview questions. I don't think some problems should be generalized. Comment without fully understanding the other party's point of view. I personally think this is meaningless. At this time, we will think that some sharer will discuss the basics and some basic knowledge. I don't know anything about it.

In addition, I want to talk about my own opinions on the basic concepts of application development that I don't need to know. First of all, I personally think that the Foundation must be understood. The more you want to go up, the more important the foundation is. Like building a building, the foundation is poor, and the building can be high. If you do not understand the basics of application development, how can you optimize yourProgramTo improve the performance of your program? More and more people feel that if you have a solid foundation (not a back-to-back) and really understood it, you will soon learn a new technology. Of course, if your application development is performance-oriented, You Don't Have To optimize it, but you just can run it. You can use it, and you don't need it. So do you want to grow? Of course, if you think that the program can be used, and the business is the most important, I have nothing to say. I am reading the book "CLR via C #" And I also recommend it.

So much nonsense, just the voice of a cainiao. Don't scold me.