MBA organizational behavior-about the soldiers of Malaysia

 

When a young and promising artillery officer took office, he went to his subordinate troops to inspect the drills. He found the same situation in several troops: In the drill of a unit, a soldier always stood under the canal of the cannon from the beginning to the end, and the figure remained unchanged. The officer asked why. The answer he received was that the practice regulations demanded this. After returning, the officers repeatedly checked military information and found that the long-term artillery drill regulations still follow the rules of the non-mechanized age. The task of a soldier standing under the gun is to hold the horse's reins (because in the early days, the cannon was transported from the carriage to the front line ), this allows you to adjust the distance deviation caused by the seat force after the cannon is fired to reduce the time required for re-targeting. Currently, the cannon is highly mechanized and automated.
"
Non-Malaysian soldiers
"
Role?
?

Please use the relevant principles of Organizational Behavior Analysis
"
Non-Malaysian soldiers
"
Causes, drawbacks, and countermeasures.

This was originally
MBA
The answer to a question about organizational behavior is actually done, but it's just a copy of the detailed description from the book on the theoretical network, I felt that my hands and feet were tied tightly. So I tried to write it according to my own understanding.

As a matter of fact, the soldiers who do not pull horses exist in any company or department. To a large extent, we are unwilling to face up to this reality. On the one hand, we are unwilling to solve or touch it for various reasons, as a result, many people work hard and inefficient.

First, I want to discuss why there are soldiers who don't need to fight?

I,



The organizational structure of enterprises is the dead corner of enterprise management. Many enterprises adopt a top-down organizational structure, which seems to have clear responsibilities and a reasonable division of work, but there are actually many gray areas, as a result, no one wants to care about it, and no one wants to care about it. This objectively leads to the appearance of the soldiers who don't want to worry about it.

II,



The organizational structure of an enterprise cannot keep pace with the times. The soldiers who do not pull horses in this article are the products of the era of non-mechanization. The times have improved, but the practice regulations have not changed. This is the root cause of these soldiers, this results in a waste of manpower. The organizational structure of many enterprises is indeed reasonable at the beginning of its establishment. However, with the progress of the times and the changes in the objective situation, appropriate adjustments should also be made. Otherwise, it would be a joke that the salary could not be paid properly or accurately for half a year.

III,



The appearance of a non-Malaysian soldier is also related to himself. Of course, if a non-Malaysian soldier is a beneficiary, he would rather be a "non-Malaysian soldier"; if he is a victim, it is estimated that he will also feel boring or reflect up, but does not receive a corresponding response, so he had to blame himself and continue to "do not pull the horse soldiers.

What kind of disadvantages will a non-Malaysian soldier cause?

I,



As mentioned above, if a soldier who does not pull a horse is a beneficiary, he would rather be happy to do it himself; but other people around him would not think so. A typical standing moukeng would not be a zombie, all the advantages make him take over, which will lead to dissatisfaction of others. Therefore, everyone is scrambling to become a soldier who wants not to pull horses; in the long run, who would like to be a good employee?

II,



If a soldier without Ramma is a victim, he will blame him and vent his dissatisfaction to other colleagues. What about other colleagues? One is that he is not working every day and he is not happy, on the other hand, his mood will also be adversely affected and gradually become dull.

How can we find a solution to these problems?

I,



Analyze Organizational Structure

First, analyze your organizational structure and workflow to see if your architecture and process are reasonable, whether it can adapt to changes in the external environment, and whether your decisions can be implemented quickly.

II,



Find the soldiers who are not pulling the horse and analyze them together.

Believe that no one is willing to be a soldier without any help. By analyzing the problems of the organization itself and the work flow, it is not difficult for us to find the soldiers who do not need. However, it is necessary to further analyze the causes of the occurrence of the soldiers. Is the organizational structure setup unreasonable or the reason for this person.

III,



Develop solutions based on analysis results

What should I do? It's not just a simple exit. If it is caused by the organizational structure, we should optimize the organizational structure. "People do their best and everything is used" is our goal, arrange a reasonable person in a suitable position. What if it is the reason for this person? We should help them grow together based on the principle of saving lives. For example, we should designate a corresponding performance appraisal system to carry out relevant assessments.

In fact, it is not terrible to see the soldiers who don't need to worry about him. What's terrible is that we don't want to face him up, analyze him, and solve him. Sometimes I feel like I am a soldier without a Trojan, with no clear responsibilities, no clear division of labor, too much office politics, and too much seeking for a balance.