Modify the Limit function point from the format editor to see the current project quality

Modify the Limit function point from the format editor to see the current project quality

About development quality :

1whenever a new module is tested, The most commonBugs,It's a process that can't get through .( Service not up? no docking when the data is docked.,the code didn't commit, and so on.,  interface Data error when entering new module new function,cannot be loaded., The basic function is not realized and so on seriously affect the test subsequent progressbug). so considering whenever a new module is being tested,arrange for a person to make a simple point of function, find out what's going through the flow.Bugs,Let development repair.

2as the current development is only responsible for the modules developed by themselves,no overall understanding of the whole system. When there is a function of different module linkage, appearance ofBugthe odds are high.. (like: previously in the Asahi Cloud,The team leader cannot be changed casually,But the telescope needs to be easily changed.. while setting the team leader,You can change it at random.,but in some stages, actually ,,changed and didn't change the same, the function points of the main linkage are not adjusted at the same time,thus producingbug). is there a basic understanding of the overall basic functional point of the system that should be considered for development?(just a personal opinion .).

about test quality :

Review the discovery of when the format editor should limit the problem of not being able to change at will :

Cases that previously caused serious impact on this issue :

1 due to the error in setting the Account property of the question , the system is defined and can not change the answer card , resulting in the score of the sub-subjects of the total error , Physics Teacher To change the problem of chemistry , and then directly let the background changed the subject of the topic Properties )

2 due to the setting of the answer card , the problem attribute set error , choose to do the problem set to non-selected to do , resulting in the assignment of the task is not selected as the assignment, At the end of the grade, , The objective result of choosing a problem is all wrong , Finally, the students ' grades are all wrong. . ( later through the background to modify the program Data , get the correct objective results , and then by manual manual processing to get the final correct total score )

Because this restriction has a large impact on the program , I asked about the development and testing, and what kind of implementation is used in the telescope , because we understand how the program is implemented , to be tested according to the implemented rules .

When I just asked how this was going to come true,, development immediately came to the reaction of the,There's still a problem with this place.. The test feedback is that the scan is uploaded and no more edits are made., and to assign a quiz teacher before you can scan and upload. Development says: Scan and assign irrelevant. finally let the development and testing together to decide when to limit the specific,limit which wait,Development feedback to develop4Business Days. (this and the associated function points are4Business days before testing,affect the test progress)

The problem that can be fed back is that the test has less knowledge of the system. The function of this limitation is a very important basic function in the system . , The test does not know about this feature . When the test is not clear about the rules of the system , It indicates whether the rule has been implemented , Whether there is a problem , and has never been tested . (The same goes for the rules on whether scanning and distribution are relevant )

Individual perceptions of this problem :

1 test work There is no document that clearly states the limitations of this feature and the importance of this feature   develop how to develop and test what function points to measure > totally dependent on your own personal insights and familiarity with the system )

2 test work test target unclear For the tested function module ( ), can only be guaranteed to operate according to their own operation thinking can create a common test and reading the

3 test Work , the examination system is imperfect . ( if the 1.2 Two cannot be solved , the assessment of this item does not make much sense ) no rules, inadequate surrounding area . , no effective system-bound test behavior , testing is done entirely by personal responsibility and personal mindset .

For the above questions , My personal advice is :

Schedule a person to clear the test task too late . personal insights and familiarity.

1 whenever a new module is tested Arrange for a person to simply point to the function Find out the way out of the process Span style= "FONT-FAMILY:CALIBRI;" >bug ( Span style= "font-family: the song Body;" > The comparison of the test is rough less work ) , Let's fix it enough, There's no need to schedule two people to work Span style= "FONT-FAMILY:CALIBRI;" >.

2 When the process can go through , the function module of the walk through the process of a finer integration test to ensure that the input and output of the functional points are normal . This is much more work than a process test. , so one more person should be arranged. , Sub-module is responsible for fine testing )

3 After all the detailed functions of the module have been measured , all the Testers , the whole system of the system to go through the process .

Division of Labor Recommendations : the new module walk process : Liu Lin , meticulous testing : Fondichi , Zhou Rong .

Testing , target recommendations :

1 Walk the process tester , to ensure that the basic use of the function points can walk through . The definition of the function point used by the foundation is defined by this person , and record the definition as a simple test case )

2 The finer integration Testers are responsible for the various input and output conditions of each function point that they have tested. It also records the input and output of the function points in the form of simple test cases based on the level of personal insight and familiarity .

Modify the Limit function point from the format editor to see the current project quality