Onlookers Tangram JS Library _javascript Skills

Tangram official website.
http://tangram.baidu.com/tangram/

Onlookers community:
Simple community, direct use of Tieba. Feedback is not much information.
According to the merits, deficiencies, questions, suggestions, separate look.

Advantages:
Localization and Chinese characteristics.
Caisonghai:
Tangram Tangram very good support domestic
Willstier:
is pure Chinese, for those of us who have not enough English, may be more appropriate.
I am a set of baby:
Baidu's engineers with Baidu's wages write Baidu class library of Chinese documents, more than the Hobby translation import underwear document efficiency to high

Open source gives corporate image bonus points.
Beautiful after the day:
Open source is the right path, do more to contribute less evil. (JK: Has not understood, Baidu has done what evil.) )
Willstier:
Hope this thing can give Baidu a bit more positive image

Small folding size, can be customized.
Gun Gun _ Shooter:
Can be customized, this function is too cool. This looks like the others are not.
Wuduoyi:
...... (The original text, the effect is fine order, jquery can not do)
Andyhonglove:
Looked, very good, smaller than the JQ volume, thanks to Baidu. (JK: The size that should be customized on demand.) )

Insufficient:
Documentation issues:
I am a set of baby:
Look at the API documents, the entire base library is nothing to surprise, the UI library components ugly, it seems that there is no appearance of customization, code encapsulation is not elegant.
XRSF13:
Baidu found no technical documents, if this underwear no bright spots, I would rather continue to use JQ
1 's love:
The development document actually mixed in the English quotes, I can only threw, that this thing is still not for good
zsl198854:
Also browser support,,, complete handcuffs you a simple example of all the error!
Ishanon:
The documents of the official website are really not flattering.
(JK: documentation, this stuff is really a problem.) )

"Frame" and "frame flail".
Banquet Masks:
Kidnapping is a complete kidnapping. Learning JS is a must d. Be careful to be kidnapped. It's going to be hard to see.

Ease of use.
Miao Rong:
Operation, feel no JQ and ext to the streamlined utility. Get a DOM,JQ only need to enter $ ExtJS is also just ext.get and this requires a long string to enter. Although you can first var a baidu.dom but personal feeling, or too long. Proposed streamlining. (Jk:tangram also has a chained call (Element), but it's a bit rough compared to JQ. )

Questions:
Netizen Willstier:
1. Whether Baidu can persist in doing
2. Whether there will be sufficient peripheral resources. After all, jquery has a wealth of resources.
Folyred:
Whether Baidu will insist on improving and updating, and how to integrate resources (as opposed to the fast updating of jquery etc.).
I am a set of baby:
Baidu full-time to do this project engineers how many? will not be the development of products is this group of people, do Tangram project is also this group of people, Baidu product development busy time, this underwear will not be washed for several months.
Now in addition to IE, many browsers will automatically upgrade, today released a library, tomorrow browser upgrade may not be compatible, especially the UI components. What about this time?
Yojeajie
When Baidu or the community can provide a good development environment for the Tangram and localization of the API.

Suggestions.
In the community, you don't see any valuable advice.
------------------------------------------------

Some ideas of JK:
1. About Tangram's name.
It's a name with Chinese characteristics.
is a cold word, for Tangram users, in Baidu or Google search Tangram, search results will meet the expected.
Insufficient is: inconvenient memory, not good abbreviation.
2. About namespace Baidu.
Actually do not understand, as an open source project, why should the namespace with Baidu? Instead of using Tangram (if you use Tangram, you need to solve the problem of what "Tangram should be abbreviated").
3. Custom Function/localization (native original, natural local) is the Tangram two bright spots.
4. Easy to use/encapsulation skills/code structure/extension, Ms still has a lot of improvement places.

Using a library can be very costly and risky.
As it is now, Tangram needs to be improved to become a "convenient", "healthy" and "reliable" framework for project developers.
But for some JS hobby, use it as a function library, to develop independent components, is a good choice.

It's a personal point of view, biased, and a lot of mistakes.