Pay attention to Delphi.NET, oh, we have to Annex A version of (from CSDN)

Well, I've been named again. I was already working on an article about delphi/delphi.net and Microsoft.NET, but I didn't have time to do it (I've said it several times in the forum). Some things I am not convenient to say, these things should be Borland people, such as Brother Tomm (the Taiwanese Baolan product manager), his information about Borland should be more correct, because I am Delphi 6 Beta Tester, also Microsoft. NET's beta Tester.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
I can briefly say my views, but these views are my personal views, you can refer to.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
1. Delphi 6 will still be the best Native development tool under window, at least 2, 3 years if I want to write the traditional native app, Delphi 6 is preferred. Just hope Borland don't rush to launch Delphi 6.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
2.. NET will still gradually become the mainstream development environment under window, window tool manufacturers need support. But it may take at least 1-2 years. NET will become mainstream.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
3. In the. NET, COM + is still the core technology. Although. NET has a new component model, similar to VCL, that can only be used in all support. NET in the language. However, the pooling, transaction and so on are still relying on COM + to complete. So COM + is still very important.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
4. In Beta 1. NET Data-aware is still not as good as Delphi, but the Beta 2 has improved.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
5. I like C #, but I also like object Pascal. Two languages have their pros and cons. Borland can continue to improve object Pascal in Delphi.NET. Then I might still use Object Pascal.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Actually, I think. NET's framework is intact, but. NET Framework in my view still has a little gap with VCL's component framework. NET Framework and Java class is relatively close, most require programmers to write a bunch of program code. Borland's specialty is the design framework, such as Owl, VCL is better than the mirosoft design. So Borland can be in. NET on the framework of a more biased VCL this component framework, then we can borlnders in delphi.net to enjoy than the use of microsoft.net people higher productivity. Borland does not need to write another framework and. NET Framework competition, on the contrary to make good use of. NET framework to create a better. NET VCL. This prevents Microsoft from using OS dominance to combat Borland, such as MFC for Owl, and a full-featured, Easy-to-use framework to counter Microsoft.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
。 NET is really a tough test for Borland, but I'm not worried that Borland can't handle it. As long as Borland invest enough resources, just like the JBuilder. I'm just worried about Borland let a team develop Delphi, C + + Builder, Kylix, Kylix for C + +. So it's not good, and that's the last thing I can accept. Delphi clearly also for Borland earn a lot of money, but not to invest in relative resources, a bit unfair. Well, there's too much to say, so let's tomm to publish it.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Appendix:
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Here are the rest of the forum:
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Q: Is it going to be shipped in June? How can you say it's not urgent?
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
A: Haha, I pretended not to know that June to ship well.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Q: Do not know when the official version of the release? I think it's strange why is the beta version of M's product used by so many people?
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
A: About the end of the year. This is the difference between Microsoft and Borland strategy, but I hope Borland will be able to open a
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Points, such as Borland 1, have more than tens of thousands of beta tester, the biggest test plan Borland has ever had to cook. And then there was no more.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Q: Yes! Yes, on top of that, you can rack framework!. But I think the concept of package in Java makes the function library very easy to understand, and its language has quite a lot of features, I/O can write a book.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
For:. NET is also very good, light. NET in the category of Xml/soap can also write several books. Maybe I belong to the utility, so whether it's Delphi,java or. NET I look at the actual "usability value". From my personal point of view, unless Sun continues to harden Java, otherwise. NET architecture at present is relatively good, but. NET is a platform that is positioned only in the window series. Sun's hot Spot compiler has become a joke, but led by Anders. NET is not a joke. Right now. NET Beta1 is faster than Java, and when Beta 3 starts to adjust speed. NET can be a lot more than Java.
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
Q: Borland's research and development staff is a real war! In addition, Jbuilderd's book seems to be few and few, in foreign countries should be more popular!
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
A: Hey, if you can explain the direction of the good, but I am afraid of Borland investment resources not enough, and caused the historical mistakes, I hope I am. JBuilder does sell well in Anglo-American countries.