People, performance and professional ethics

This article with a very image of the metaphor, the beginning of the pig, chicken and parrot, it is clear to let us know what they represent, in fact, a team is really a lot of people together, some people have the expectation of the small, some pay more, some pay less, We can easily figure out where everyone occupies. Some people are pigs, they want to project success, it is necessary to come up with their own meat, last stand, once failed, their own strongholds also lost in, their input level is to devote themselves. Some people are chickens, they can make a significant contribution, but once the project fails, their loss will not be too big, their life can continue, they just participate, some people are parrots, articulate, network, can make a lot of comments, many ideas, but they do not do, There is no other investment in the idea of mere conformity and the empty talk about architecture, and his level of investment is onlookers.

The corresponding performance is also closely related to it, no matter what your positioning is, you have to be responsible for the position, also corresponding to your performance is proportional to your work, how to evaluate performance, each team, each company has its own evaluation criteria, regardless of whether he is really fair and impartial, but he has his own system in , the team cooperation is divided into several stages, the embryonic stage, the running-in stage, the normative stage, the creation stage. In the embryonic stage, everyone's roles and responsibilities are not clear, the procedures are often overlooked, the communication will be less, in the running-in phase, with the deepening of communication, everyone's opinions are different, some people will not be immersed in gas, there will be small differences of opinion and conflict, these conflicts are not necessarily technical problems, perhaps the role, Responsibilities, interrelationships, and even the clash of their personalities and cultures. Everyone will compete and even have the right to fight, eventually forming a relatively stable small groups. At the normative stage, the members had a lot of consistency, the roles and responsibilities were clearly defined, and the team had interesting team-building activities.

Professional Ethics for Software engineering

The behavior of the software engineer shall be consistent with the public interest, and the Engineer shall act in a manner that maximizes the interests of his clients and employers, and shall ensure that his products and related modifications meet the highest professional standards and shall have complete and independent professional judgment, Experience and leaders should advocate and personally adopt ethical methods to manage the development and maintenance of software. In accordance with the principle of public interest, software engineers should ensure the integrity and credibility of their profession, software engineers should be fair to colleagues, and support and help, software engineers should lifelong learning to improve their professional standards, and in the work of practice to promote the implementation of the Code of Ethics.

People, performance and professional ethics