I often hear the company say this when recruiting people: people who are already married.
Because it is more "qualitative" than people who are not married ".
It sounds like that, huh?
However, the problem is not explained at all.
If a person is married, the marriage will not be broken. It indicates that the person has a certain endurance and the ability to resolve or resolve conflicts. This is the same as the ability that a person needs to collaborate in a company team.
But no one made this clear. Why? Maybe they are thinking: If you already understand what you don't know, let them continue to understand what you do. I have no obligation to explain this.
This selfish feature is the norm of Chinese society. It may also be the norm in the world. The less people know, the more they have more control over things, and the more they are able to improve their relative competitiveness.
Most people have this feature. But at least it seems more decent than deliberately misleading others, maybe? Wait, as I said at the beginning, is it misleading to answer others?
Of course, it is also very likely that in some companies, this is just a high-sounding rhetoric. The real reason is: if you are married, you do not need to give him or her a marriage leave or maternity leave. This is more economical for the company.