Languages without words survived for thousands of years in China. Many minority languages have been created after the founding of the state to provide them with the invention of words.
The ability to speak English is just a matter of words. Because of the problem of syllables and have to repeat the use of a large number of single/double syllable words, resulting in a large number of polysemy. So that interlacing as Foster, alone with a word out of it does not know which line, meaning what. The Chinese first uses the multi-tone, makes the syllable shorter, can more easily use the multi-syllable word to express clearly. And the Chinese also uses the pronunciation and the literal separation, thus constructs the massive homonyms to solve this problem completely.
Major languages have undergone great changes in the course of their development. Chinese plainly, only once, is in modern times, and that is only the strict written language and colloquial unified together. In fact, if you look at the throne of the Yongzheng Grant, you will find that there is no obvious difference between the non-strict written language and today's writing. and English. Do you want to see what medieval English looks like? You may wish to read the following paragraph:
Jone, E Wyf of Chuse, Procuratour of Eroude, and Susanne, and Manye Oere, Whiche Mynystriden to him of her riches.
Do you think this part of the understood? Are you sure you understand? Come, this is modern English (Luke 8:3)
Joanna the wife of Chuza, the manager of Herod ' s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.
The above paragraph was less than 200 years before Shakespeare (published in 1384). Do you really think English is a system? It's too much to underestimate. And look at the following paragraph
"Autumn, July, Chung Qiang good seal, such as Longxi, Hanyang." The Shuma of the former school is for the people, the town to caress the species. Winter, October, the protection of the Qiang school Shima soldiers strike good seal, broken. ”
It was written in 1064.
——————————————————————————————
Chinese has long gone through the need for mass-generation. In fact, the number of words used in Chinese has shrunk over the last hundreds of years. Do not say Kangxi Big dictionary, say Xinhua dictionary, there are many words that have not been used.
Word-word is not a Chinese problem at all. There are more than 20,000 characters in Unicode (Jianfan). The difference between simplified and traditional Chinese characters is only over 2000. So in fact the Chinese resources are now at least 18,000. The commonly used Chinese characters are only three thousand or four thousand. A large number of rare Chinese characters can be redefined for use. For example, "felling" is almost no use now. The future needs to describe a particular kind of textile that can be used in this word entirely. The Chinese font contains a large number of Chinese characters that are not used at all. Even existing Chinese characters are used, but also worry about the problem of word-formation?
So people can spontaneously come up with an unused kanji to redefine the use, which is what is happening now. such as "embarrassing", such as "cuss", such as "Niao". You want to think of course you can not be a word, so the Chinese character can not develop, completely unfounded. The future can even be separated from the corresponding traditional characters, such as "simplified characters" can be completely redefined.
https://www.ccthere.com/article/3855904
Poor Western language and writing