"Software Engineering" Curriculum summary additional questions.

Additional jobs answer the following questions:

1. Where do you think this course needs to be improved, specific measures, including: time schedule, project difficulty, etc. can be;

A: Maybe because the class change is more urgent, many places have not adapted. Schedule may be the teacher is not too much to consider students in addition to this course need to busy things.

Project difficulty is not, because not to say, the difficulty of self-determined, depending on your own requirements. More likely to be the problem of convergence before

Probably not much practical experience.

2. What do you think the TA/teacher does not do enough, where the limit is too much;

A: First of all, thank you for teaching assistants to supervise us to complete the work, have done better. For the teacher, with my observation in the teacher class process,

Many students are not how to listen, not the teacher did not interact with the students, but the teacher this interaction itself is boring. Not to repel computers.

The software of those cutting-edge technology, and is the lack of some vivid examples of their own side of the example. People are aware of animals, I do not necessarily say that the teacher to class

Tell more stories, the story is more than in class, but like a story.

3. What do you think is the problem with the grading criteria for each project, and what do you think are the reasonable scoring criteria (three per person/pair/team);

A: The problem of communication, our ratings are concerned about the results, sometimes you see is not necessarily really a person do, not transparent.

Personal--"personal more in the results, project quality, and write good code;"

Pairing-the pair of more in the allocation of tasks, more work, the quality of the project, as well as the project communication between teammates, more positive response;

Team--"the team needs to give more contributions and more encouragement,

4. In a pair project, do you really appreciate the benefits of closing the pair, whether it is really strictly done to the programming, the workload of the two sides is the same;

A: The pair said the truth, and did not. You must say before also boast teammates, now say such words must be contradictory, this actually depends on how you think, sympathy or not.

That said, the workload of both sides is needless to say. (If you want me to tell you the truth, ask the counselor not to hang up and be hurt.) ）

5. Whether your team project is successful, if you will choose this team again, why success/failure;

A: For our team project, because there is no subsequent time in the chat function to continue to develop, so the idea before us is almost, at this point is regrettable.

Again will choose, because each teammate is mutual cooperation, we do not care about the programming ability of everyone, everyone in the team have their own price

Value, whether small or big, every detail, everyone is serious. Thanks to every teammate.

6. Summarize your team's schedule when doing the project, and can write anonymously.

A: The pre-arrangement of course is the game design team-mates design the appearance of the game interface, and related work, late game related design and programming are completed in the last few weeks, due to the

It is not so easy to reconcile yourself to the things that you have to be busy with, but these are not very much affected by our project, and many projects are not one go, always intermittent.

7. You have any other good suggestions/opinions about this course;

A: This class reform has been a great improvement, increased the enthusiasm of more students, as well as programming practice experience. But the disadvantage is that teachers do not have more interaction in class, introduce

At the same time, the cutting-edge technology can consider adding some success stories, so as to adjust the students ' positive initiative.

"Software Engineering" Curriculum summary additional questions.