"Human, performance and professional ethics" and "The life cycle of a procedural ape"

Reading "People, performance and professional ethics" after feeling quite deep. The story of a pig, chicken, and parrot takes us to the subject at the beginning of the article. In fact, in the beginning, I saw the first sentence, "in a magical jungle, there are many animals, including pigs, chickens and parrots." "It's a very vivid image and attracts attention," he added. As the story says, in peacetime work and study, everyone around him plays a role, some people are pigs, but he can devote themselves to things, some people are chickens, they just play the role of the participants, and some people, although they are dressed in beautiful appearance, But in life is only a parrot that acts as a spectator. But when we work together as a team, no matter what role we want to be or what role we really are, as long as each of us is doing our part, it is the greatest contribution to the team. In a team not to say how I want to do, I want to be the leader, as long as we work together to do this project, the glory is actually everyone's. A team without anyone is not possible, everyone needs to help each other, do a piece, do not leave the group.

In addition, to compare the performance evaluation methods of different teams, and put forward their own team's performance evaluation plan This step I very much agree and feel very deep, although different team models have different advantages and disadvantages, but in the Xin Zou teacher gave a few teams, we are more inclined to choose the first team. First of all, we are very much the same level of workers, so that our work team to maintain a close and cordial atmosphere. The task of continuous refinement, so that everyone can work together for a big goal, and in a team who do not want to because of their own reasons to delay the progress of the entire team, but also to maintain a sense of urgency for each team member. Helps every member of the team get a real workout and learn to take responsibility. Is that the companions can hold the pressure and responsibility, try their best to accomplish better.

Read the second story "radish and cabbage". Just want to say, Ken can really be "turnip cabbage each their own", if in my company, appear such two people, I will certainly choose cabbage. Although cabbage do things more slowly than radish, but can in the specified time to complete their tasks and fewer errors, I feel more efficient than the radish. Although the carrot is fast, but there are too many mistakes, he uses the time of the remaining tasks to modify the errors. This proves that the process he is doing lacks consideration and is not thoughtful. The mistakes made can also be remedied at other times. His situation is inherently more unreliable. If a project, he completed the time is the deadline, but his mistakes are too many can not be used, but the Chinese cabbage although the completion time is slow but done well, there are few mistakes.

Especially in the future work, I think the company leadership will be very appreciative of cabbage, because this kind of people have patience, have tenacity, can endure hardship, plasticity is higher, after all, want to do something skilled, need process, I think the leadership is willing to give them the opportunity.

Everyone's life is not smooth sailing, the day will be down to the great people also, will first bitter his mind, labor its bones, hungry its body skin, the growth of the road will always experience the bumpy path, only experienced these bumpy we can really grow, with a companion's help and care of our life is more brilliant!

"Human, performance and professional ethics" and "The life cycle of a procedural ape"