"Learning questions" Reading notes two

"Learn to ask questions" reading notes two because the book of small knowledge and thinking too much, I started from this note only remember I fear will forget knowledge, the process of thinking is not mentioned. Weak critical thinking and strong critical thinking the purpose of the critical thinking is to use critical thinking to refute and resist those opinions that differ from you in the end, in order to see those who are inconsistent with you obey orders willing to concede, but this means that you are not close to the truth and carry forward the virtues of indifference, In fact, it destroys the latent human side of critical thinking and the characteristics of continuous development and progress. And I think that the starting point of the weak critical thinking is selfish, they blindly think that their views are correct, with critical thinking to criticize the views of others, until they are refuted. These people generally do not use critical thinking to view their own views, which led to their departure from the truth. Strong critical thinking requires people to question all claims, especially their own propositions, with critical questions. Strong critical thinking forces people to take a dialectical view of their initial views, so as to ensure that they do not conform and deceive themselves. Strong critical thinking does not necessarily require people to abandon their initial view, which can provide a more solid foundation for these initial views. The dialectical examination of these views, on the one hand, allows us to consolidate support for it, on the other hand we can catch the ointment of the place. The way to distinguish two kinds of thinking is to compare the two states of thought openness and thought closure. When we are open-minded, we welcome all criticisms of our own ideas, and when we are closed, we will defend our views and criticize the minds of others. Critical thinking people have the main values 1) Autonomy we need to choose from a wide range of materials that can help develop our critical thinking, be careful enough, and pay attention to those who are different from our values, making decisions and choices among them. 2) Curiosity to be a critical thinker, you need to keep asking questions about everything you encounter. The skills that you learn from others is their insight and understanding, as long as their views conform to the standards of "learning to question" that the book teaches you about correct reasoning. 3) Humility and courtesy each of us is more or less guilty of some mistakes, and whenever we bow our reflection, we think of what Socrates said: "All I know is that I knew nothing." "Once we accept this reality, we are better able to recognize that our dealings with others can at least fill a small part of the gap we currently know." Moreover, the sense of humility allows us to avoid the most common obstacle to critical thinking, which is to believe that those who are left with their opinions are intolerant and stand fair. 4) The reasoning will have to worship once you find that people who are reasoned and reliable, regardless of colour, age, party, wealth, or nationality, must rely on their views without bias until more thorough and clear arguments arise。 Let the dialogue go on and on, we need to take into account how they react to other people's perceptions and conclusions. When you keep asking questions to the person you're talking to, only the same people who have the same critical thinking as yourself will be tacit and take your questions as new evidence, but most people will think you're doing nothing. So it's crucial to keep the conversation going, and the most important thing is that when you're doing critical thinking, make sure that you're learning to be motivated. In addition, let them understand that your intentions are good, if you disagree with them, no matter how many of these differences are more serious, should not end with crucified. Creating a friendly atmosphere for the conversation we can create a welcoming atmosphere to discuss questions so that reasonable people can express themselves in a dignified and generous manner. Popular film critic Roger Ebert's way of speaking is non-negotiable and debatable, see his commentary on the film "Transformers 2: A Comeback" in 2009. This way of speaking is directly conflicted with the values of a critical thinker whose values are a curiosity, courtesy and reasoning. Argue for his position, but if the use of Albert-style speech, virtually closed to critical thinking of an important issue of the door; "May I Be wrong?" "So, the gentle way of speaking is also a key point in developing critical thinking.

Learn to ask a question "reading notes two