Barbara Minto's "pyramid Principle" is a controversial book, a lot of people scoff at this book, there are many people to this book greatly praised.
people who scoff at the idea, is not the middle school argumentative writing method, "total-the total", make such a divine knife, so complex, and a simple reason to write too obscure, wordy, read very laborious. The Grand prize people think that "pyramid principle" is a very good tool, pyramid principle seems nonsense, but it is really a great principle, a great methodology.
I think the pyramid principle is really a great tool, but the pyramid principle of this book Barbara did not write well. Pyramid principle solves some doubts in my mind, in the end what is logic, what is structured thinking (or called systemic thinking), that is
clear logic must be pyramid-shaped, pyramid-like logic is the core of structured thinking . "The clarity of the
article must have a clear pyramid structure, and unclear articles are certainly not the pyramid structure" is the greatest gain I get from it, let me make clear that the pyramid is the logical clear choice, In the future, when expressing or analysing a problem, you will see if you are doing it in accordance with the pyramid principle.
Fengtang more than 10 years ago also wrote an article on the principle of the pyramid, compared to the old Lady Barbara obscure words, Fengtang write more interesting, see: Old Dan Pyramid principle.
Copyright NOTICE: Reprint Please indicate the source by the link form
"Pyramid principle" book review-Great methodology, but not a good book
