YouTube is the most famous video sharing website and is widely known after being bought by Google for a high price. The main reason why YouTube is so successful is that two young startups have seen the potential of the demand for video sharing-People want to share videos more easily. However, youTube is not the first to master the trend of video sharing. As early as this time, several websites have already launched the video sharing service. Another key to success is that YouTube is favored by more users than other websites. When YouTube was founded, the new version of flash was just about to be launched, so the Services launched by YouTube fully utilized the new features of the new version of flash to provide more convenient and easy-to-use interfaces for users, so they were favored. However, a video sharing website established earlier than YouTube cannot be immediately introduced to the new technology.
The success of YouTube is not only because they have mastered the network usage requirements that have not yet been fully developed, but also because they have mastered the correct technology. Mastering innovative technologies at the right time is a bit of luck, but it is also a bit out. In the Web 2.0 era, network applications rely heavily on technical support, not only do you need to find the right application, but you also need to find the right technology.
The example of YouTube will continue to take place in the future. In particular, the new generation of network application technology has begun to undergo a new revolution. Can YouTube make a new use of the video sharing service? The key lies in the next-generation network application technology.
The next generation of network application technology competition has started. Ajax technology is already powerful enough to drive the industry. However, the next-generation network application technology of Microsoft and Adobe is not inferior to this technology. This wave of network application technology competition is not only a big factory, but also a Web 2.0. More importantly, these new tools will release the energy of the next generation of network applications, which is enough to cause a shuffling of the industry.
If you think that AJAX is sufficient to overwrite traditional opinions on network applications, you should look at the implementation examples of Apollo and Silverlight. Although Ajax is already very popular, it is highly technical to implement Ajax. In addition, some Ajax applications will not cause a paradigm shift, so some websites are not eager to adopt Ajax.
However, Silverlight and Apollo are different from Ajax and cannot be ignored. Silverlight and Apollo have simplified the technical barriers for developing multimedia and interactive websites. With integrated development tools, it is easier to develop multimedia interactive websites. When these technologies develop more mature, it is the time when Pandora box is opened. Before the paradigm transfer is approaching, you should master the development of next-generation network application technologies as soon as possible.
Adobe's Apollo technology not only allows web pages to provide richer content and more interactive interfaces, but also allows network applications to integrate with desktop applications, users do not care whether they are used online or offline.
The Silverlight officially launched by Microsoft last week does not mean much, and even hides a larger attempt. Silverlight was previously called WPF/E, which is an important key for Microsoft to move towards Web 2.0. In addition to highly interactive and rich content web pages, Silverlight is enhanced in multimedia applications. In the example of Microsoft's film cooperation with flows', you can watch trailers transmitted over the network in full screen mode. With its image quality and playback smoothness, the future possibilities of online films are impressive.
Silverlight and Apollo will release the energy of the next generation of Web applications, and those who master these technical advantages will be able to rewrite the industry trend. For more information, see the analysis reports on Silverlight and Apollo in this topic. |
