Reprint-Different interpretations of the average transaction response time of the LR analysis and the time value in the summary

I have neglected the thinking time here.



Look at the value of the liboys transaction here. Remember them first.

then look at the time value of the Liboys transaction in this figure , and then remember them.

look at this average transaction response time The sampling time:



Granularity

2 seconds. Now I'll change to: (the elapsed time of the entire scene).

and see Average transaction response time figure.

here, I'll put Min,ave,max columns are displayed.

Is it graph ? the biggest, the smallest, the average, all the same?

Is it with Summary ? is the same as the average?

Did it turn into a four point?

What I want to say is:

Summary and the average transaction response time graph is the largest, the average figure, the minimum figure, the reason is different because the sampling is different.

average transaction time graph, in this case, the default is 2 seconds.

If they had the same sampling time, the average would be exactly the same.

Summary is the average of the time of the whole scene, the maximum minimum value, is also taken from the entire scene.

In the average transaction response time graph, the values are taken by frequency. There is nothing comparable between the two values. It doesn't matter.

is just a bunch of different ways to calculate data. In the sampling time, it may be higher than in the summary, may be low, may be flat, which is very accidental.

Reprint-Different interpretations of the average transaction response time of the LR analysis and the time value in the summary