Seize the strategic commanding heights behind the problem
Wu Yu
Taiyan Network Studio
Previous legends have argued on the Internet about the size of "Sovereignty" and "civil rights. I think this is a good test question, because it can easily express our way of thinking.
A job seeker came to the interview. I threw the question to him and asked him to say:I don't care about your position. What I want to know is what you will do if your brother is divided into two schools for debate.
He was surprised by this question. After thinking about it, he replied to me that his support for sovereignty was larger. I said, does that change to your confrontation with another brother? He added that he would consider changing his position if he could persuade him.
Looking at his embarrassing expression, I know what the problem is. This is just like why there is a debate on the internet,Too many people only see the problem and defend the "truth" based on this". Although his answer lacks ideas, it is basically a regular answer and is in line with general thinking.
I would like to remind him that, if we are not talking about "Sovereignty" and "Civil Rights", but "C ++" and "Java", which of your brothers is better at arguing, this is related to the programming language used in the next project. He almost blurted out his answer this time and hit the key: this should be analyzed in detail!
I smiled and said, "Sovereignty" and "Civil Rights" cannot be "analyzed in detail?
I have encountered several such issues recently. The general situation is to take the opposite appearance for me to handle, and I think the real reason is not here.The strategic commanding heights behind the problem did not enter our vision.
For example, the project manager described to me that two teams said that the data we provided was slow, and one team said it was slow ~ 6 seconds, the other team simply said it was 10 seconds slow. I cannot understand that there is still such a big gap between slowness and slowness. Ask the project manager to check the difference. According to the feedback, 10 seconds is the result of comparison with Beijing time. I said, this does not indicate any problems at all. The comparison standards should be shown by similar software. Okay. This feedback is about the same speed. Slow 4 ~ I believe that the project manager can handle the problem in 6 seconds.
Another story about winning strategic heights is my family life. For some time, I have noticed that my wife is too busy and often hurts people. In my eyes, there is no change in my family. The daily living standard is still like that. My wife has nothing to buy. The reason for a woman is usually curved, And the appearance is almost none of the reasons. The reason mentioned must also be an excuse.
This time the cause of the problem was accidental.I found that women have preferences that men cannot understand about "privacy" and "intimacy.Men may have buddies and friends, but they won't be "friends" like women ". The friendship between men is mostly based on righteousness and the same type. They are hero likes and heroes, and "Fox Friends" and "dog friends ". Women are different. women prefer to share their secrets. Although these secrets are not important at all, women also prefer to get together. It can be said that "loneliness" is the enemy of women.
Now, the story is my private affair.
We must pay attention to the terrain and find the strategic commanding heights behind the problem.I believe that what you see is only the appearance, and the reason must be behind the problem.