Simple reasoning enough to overturn Evolution

First, let's clarify a concept. The "Evolution" mentioned in this Article refers to the evolution from low-level to high-level, that is, narrow-sense evolution. It is a concept opposite to "degradation. For example, a deer evolved into a giraffe, and a bamboo evolved into a bamboo. It can also be regarded as a broad evolution, but the evolution direction is not from low to advanced, therefore, it is not the "evolutionary phenomenon" that this Article refers ".

According to the theoretical basis of evolution, "resource race, survival of the fittest" means that the result of natural selection is to leave the species most adaptable to the environment and eliminate the species that cannot adapt to the environment. Then there is a problem, that is, who is better able to adapt to the environment for advanced and low species (here we are talking about the adaptability of species rather than individuals )? The answer is of course low-level species. Why? Because the number of low-level species is large, the life cycle is short, and the breeding ability is strong, the probability of a new species mutating is large, and the time is short, and the high-level species are the opposite. That is to say, when the environment changes suddenly, low-level species will soon be able to adapt, but the mutation speed of high-level species is not as high as that of low-level species, and even cannot keep up with the environment change speed, advanced species should be eliminated first. Viruses are more adaptable than bacteria, and bacteria are more adaptable than parasites, which is known in medicine.

Of course, this conclusion is not applicable to humans, because humans can transform the environment, but other advanced species except humans cannot truly transform the environment. People are the spirit of all things. In fact, people and animals should not be put together for comparison.

That is to say, according to the principle of natural choice, the evolution direction of species should be from high to low, without the evolution from low to high.

The above shows that evolution is impossible from a macro perspective. Now we can prove this conclusion from a micro perspective.

Arbitrary selection of the DNA structure of a species, which goes through a random genetic mutation, the structure after the mutation will produce three results: the first is destructive, will lead to death or failure to breed; the second is simpler and more disordered, that is, lower level. The third is more complex, more orderly, and more advanced. Remove the first result and discuss the remaining two results.

Because dna is only a record of genetic information, it can be completely abstracted into a mathematical model. According to the theory of probability theory, the probability of a lower-level structure is much higher than that of a higher-level structure (more than 100 times ). The structure most suitable for the Environment has nothing to do with the advanced or low level. Therefore, the probability of this species's evolution to the lower level is much higher than that of the higher level, and this conclusion applies to any mutation process.

Why is the probability of a lower-level structure far greater than that of a higher-level structure? This conclusion can be strictly proved by probability theory, which is not discussed in detail here. In fact, it is very understandable, just like a software program. If the source code is randomly modified, the software may have a probability of missing or simplified functions, far greater than the chance that software functions become stronger and more advanced. Of course, the software may not be available if the function is missing or simplified. If the function is not required or is not complex, it may be simpler and easier to use than the original one, this corresponds to the possibility of low-level evolution of species, which exists. The possibility of advanced evolution is almost zero.

The strong tendency to degrade caused by each genetic mutation. After a long period of accumulation, the result is absolute degradation. Evolution is impossible. Because probability theory is purely mathematical, this conclusion is not only applicable to the Earth, but also to any external planet, whether it is DNA or other material that records the genetic information of alien life, it can also be abstracted into a mathematical model, that is, "there is no evolutionary phenomenon in the universe ".