Six leadership styles

Building a team from a common team is not common, meaning understanding and accepting the differences between team management and leadership. Peter Drucker, a writer and consultant, said: "management is to make things right; leadership is to do the right things.

In the company, managers and leaders may sometimes be confused, but these two positions are completely different. The management personnel are the facilitator who promotes the success of team members. They ensure that all team members have high productivity and promote the success of projects being developed by the team. Most of the management personnel are well-trained and optimistic, they can clear the obstacles to success. Most of them have superior abilities, can cope with multiple challenges, and can be promoted quickly.

On the contrary, leaders are worthy of special talents in the team. They have a broad mind and rich ideas. They have rich experience in a certain field and can help managers and the entire team. The reason why a leader leads is that they have strengths, rather than relying on the title of "Leader.

Good managers can adapt to different leaders and lead the entire team forward.

When you are faced with difficulties and challenges, when you cannot find a proper solution after thinking about the difficulties, the title printed on your business card cannot help you. Sometimes, a project has to go through numerous difficulties before and after, and sometimes the opportunities are too fast to grasp. Therefore, teams need to work together to use everyone's wisdom and skills to solve the problem and overcome the difficulties.

Why is it impossible for upper-and lower-level military leaders to do so in a fast-growing world? This is the reason. I think Tom Peter is right. He said, "Good leaders will not create more employees, but cultivate more leaders ." When we talk about how to lead a company, a group of people with special talents can get together for a longer-term and more feasible development solution, so as to overcome unknown difficulties and challenges.

Change leadership style

Not only can the team members allow leaders with different abilities to take turns to lead the team, but they also need to understand that the leader's ability must change according to the environment and needs of the team. Sometimes a team member needs the care of others, and sometimes the team needs to perform physical training. Like playing golf, different venues require different clubs. leaders should not only be familiar with the company's affairs and ultimate development goals, but also change their leadership style at any time.

According to a three-year survey by Daniel Goleman on more than 3000 middle-level managers, the results of a study titled leadership decisions were obtained. The purpose of his investigation is to find out the effects of specific leadership methods in a team atmosphere.

The survey shows that the management leadership will affect 30% of the company's revenue! Even if the leadership method can produce 1% of the influence, it can also create a lot of profits for the company, and reduce a lot of spending on dealing with transactions and improving efficiency for the company.

The following are the six types of leadership styles and the effects of different leadership styles on the team:

1. Benchmark-based leadership: the imitation objects of team members with excellent performance and self-guidance. If you want to concentrate this kind of leadership style into one sentence, it is "Do as I do, right away !" It is most appropriate to use benchmarking leaders after the team members are skilled and transferred. However, if this style is used too much, it will suppress team members and eliminate innovation.

2. authoritative leadership: push the entire team forward, pay attention to the final results, and let the members of the team handle the problem on their own. If you want to combine this leadership style into one sentence, you can "Come with me ". Authoritative leadership is the best if the environment changes because the team needs a new development vision. Authoritative leaders are full of entrepreneurial spirit and provide entrepreneurial passion for the entire team. However, this style may be inappropriate if someone in the team is more professional than him.

3. affinity-based leadership: cultivate feelings with team members and give them the feeling of family members. If we concentrate this leadership style into one sentence, it is "people-oriented ". This kind of affinity is the best way to lead when a team is under pressure and Members need psychological comfort or confidence reconstruction. This kind of leadership style should not be used frequently. Excessive use may lead to excessive reliance on leadership and lack of development direction.

4. Coaching leadership: Cultivate team members for the future of the enterprise. If you want to concentrate this kind of leadership style into one sentence, you can "try this way ". This coaching style is very effective when leaders want to develop their individual lifelong abilities. However, if there are no team members, do not want to learn or change, or the business of the leaders is not skilled, the efficiency of this leadership style will be very low.

5. High-Pressure leadership: Members are absolutely required to obey the leadership. If we concentrate this kind of leadership style into one sentence, it will be "Do what you do ". When a team is facing crisis, such as enterprise transformation, solution restructuring, fire or flood, high-pressure leadership is the most effective. It is also effective when dealing with troublesome team members. Exercise caution, because this leadership style is easy to break away from team members, killing flexibility and creativity.

6. Democratic leadership: build consensus through full participation. If you want to combine this leadership style into one sentence, it is "What Do You Think You Should Do ". When a team faces difficulties in making decisions on choices, plans, and goals, or the leaders cannot make decisions, the democratic leadership is most effective when the team's professionals need to put forward new ideas. However, this kind of leadership style is inappropriate when team members are not informed of insufficient information in an emergency.

Different leadership styles can be selected based on the specific circumstances of the team, and multiple leadership styles can be used in combination, which can inspire the entire team to win for a long time.

Source: fastcompany