Small talk growth method (REV 2)

Small talk growth method (REV 2)

Liu Jianwen, http://blog.csdn.net/keminlau

)

 

I often hear people say that the plan cannot keep up with the changes, and tomorrow is like a box of chocolate. I don't know what the next one will look like. Indeed, who can predict tomorrow? Living is an adventure. What we can do is either think positively or be passive or helpless. However, even if you choose to face it positively, it is not enough because you have to focus on methods. If you have a method, you have to perform operations to verify the effectiveness of the method. But in our most important ten years of youth, how can we withstand a careless mouse test? Life growth is not just an eternal topic.

I often talk to people around me about my growth methodology-long and short-term goals, and stick to and adjust them as appropriate. Some people agree, but it is more of silence and understandable. After all, it is too metaphysical and should be supplemented in detail.

First, the goal is very important. If you don't even know what you like or want to do, it's a bad thing. The persistence and adjustment in the future are also useless. Because persistence is to select a specific narrow direction, and adjustment is also a partial fine-tuning.

The objective score is very important, because people are not machines after all, and emotions have a great impact on human behavior. Machines only need energy to keep moving forward. The motivation for people to keep moving forward is not as simple as electricity. instant feedback on learning is a kind of motivation. Furthermore, short targets reduce the cost of your blind choice.

Persistence is more important. Now, in a fair and free society, power is no longer derived from inheritance, nor is it obtained by the husband of the martial arts. Power is directly proportional to knowledge and experience. However, if you listen to your senses and distract yourself, your realm will soon reach a plateau level, and you will not be able to make a qualitative leap in your realm; we must rationally calm down and stick to the same thing.

The adjustment is required because the first choice is often biased.

 

P.s. My "growth methodology" is trying to control my future and commercialize my future. Unfortunately, this is only subjective intent. Facts often have unpredictable things.

For example, I said that learning should have a goal, and what should I do if I have a goal. This is just a hypothesis. Imagine who can give a clear and operable goal at the beginning? For example, if my goal is to become a hacker, but before I start to become a hacker, I must understand the specific meaning of the hacker. That is to say, in the process of achieving an ultimate goal, there will be some secondary goals with higher priority that need to be completed first, which we call "supervision goals ". Moreover, it is hard to imagine that a hacker does not understand mathematics, CPU, and operating system principles. This shows that the ultimate goal includes many "sub-goals ". The sub-object is systematically formed as a big goal. There are also sub-targets in the sub-targets. The targets are nested and hierarchical. Each layer has some "supervision targets" to evaluate and supervise the completion of the targets at this layer; we call the sub-goal look-inside, and the supervision target look-aside.

 

I developed this "growth methodology", but I did not succeed on my own, so I may not be qualified to preach, but I tried to prove my belief. The following are some "feedback" written after the March s decision ":

The second ten days of regression code, I did a little research on meta-cognition. The progress of software engineering and software components was slow and fast, because meta-cognition can open the horizon, learn more about things. Come on!

C. I have gained a lot from the next two months. Today, I went home from the Internet to recharge my bank. Check the progress. It should be the last time!

C. the third ten days have passed, that is, a month. At the beginning, I said that I could learn a specific skill in a month, and my practice proved that I could not do it for a month. According to the current progress, it should not take a month or less than two months. However, I am not flustered at all, and do not feel that I am making a speech because I feel that I am making progress every day. This feeling is real. What else is more important than this?

C. The fourth day is over. In the first two days, the painting of the custom control in the Code is jumped into the operating system, so most of the time I am studying the operating system. The research result is a better understanding of computer systems (including hardware. This operating system study gave me a better understanding of what is integrated, and gave me a more choice for job search, that is, driver development.

C. unconsciously, the fifth day has been completed, and the result is a decision to turn completely to drive development. The Research on the operating system structure gives me some new experiences: first, I feel that I have found the matching point between theory and practice, that is, the driver. Second, I have studied the complex and changing application frameworks, after learning about the operating system structure, C language development will be easier, and you may find a job faster. The job is also "fixed ". More importantly, the operating system is required. I would not take a detour. Work hard, come on!

1:17:03

C. It will be two months after the sixth ten days of code learning. I don't know why, even though the time passes by, I still don't know the day when I went to work, but I am not panic at all. It may be because I feel that I have changed too much in a month. I may not need to write a small software to prove my ability. As time passes, maybe I suddenly got a job. After thinking about it, what's more important is that I understand computers more and more thoroughly, and I am not confused about my work, just as I am not confused about my life after studying philosophy.

13:16:37

C. Finish the work in the seventh day. Completed the interrupt mechanism and fully understood the bus system. In the end, I always felt that it was not transparent enough, so I decided to "solve the problem" and start to unlock the CPU and learn the assembly language.

12:04:57

C. The eighth day has been completed. The biggest achievement is not to deconstruct the CPU. Because the CPU involves a wide range of aspects, deconstruct can only be preliminary. You must write some specific programs to better analyze CPU behavior, for example, how the CPU command implements a software function, the biggest benefit is to summarize the design, design, and work nature, and when to start working.

P.s. The learning feedback entries in this diary will be appended until I find a job.