SP1 patches occupy less memory and play games"

When Microsoft's official Windows Vista SP1 "leaked version" appeared on the Internet, many "Vista fans" first downloaded and installed and tested. The following is how a user on a vista Forum feels after installing and testing.ArticleWe can see that the user's overall results for Windows Vista SP1 are "ideal ".

Test environment:

Related information	Description
System	Windows Vista advanced Home Edition
CPU	P4 1.8
Memory/graphics card	1 GB, fx5200
PatchProgram	Windows Vista SP1 leaked 171m independent patch
Remarks	The installation process is based on the default settings, and no functional settings are modified after installation.

The test results are as follows:

1. Before installation, the home advanced edition optimized the default services: print, second login, tablepc, USB flash drive acceleration, and firewall (because Kabbah 6 is installed ).

2. The wait time for entering the desktop is a little faster than that for 2008ctp (Note: Not 2008beta3), and faster than that for not installing the SP1 Patch. You can click Refresh on the desktop to perform other operations. This is good! However, the progress bar appears to be three more laps than the original one.

3. The memory usage is reduced from the original memory m to about MB (this is similar to that of 2008ctp ).

4. the CPU is also relatively stable, and it is not as stable as the original one.

5. operations such as copying, deleting, and clearing the recycle bin are close to those of XP. Moving a file also calculates the time, but it's just an instant.

6. The entire system interface is unchanged because it is a collection of patches. This is equivalent to the Update effect. It only fixes the stability and compatibility.

7. The compatibility is much better than the original one. One of the three of us can use the software that shared the Internet. (However, we dropped the line once last night. I don't know if it was a compatibility issue or a Netcom issue)

8. The execution of Office 2007 was significantly accelerated.

9. Playing CS is no longer stuck, and the picture is smooth.

10. The occupied space of drive C has increased from 7.8gb to 8.5 GB.

11. Compared with version 2008ctp, it seems better.

12. The patch installation process is very boring and takes too long.

Last night, in the Vista advanced Home Edition, bitcom 0.90 was used for 20 minutes to download a patch set circulating on the Internet for 171m. It took 3 hours and 28 minutes for installation.

The Last guess is: The 171m patch is likely to contain all the patches after RTM (about 50 MB), because I found that there are not so many patches after update, if the patch is about 50 MB, the quantity is enough.

Comments:

Although Microsoft did not provide more official instructions on the leaked version of Vista SP1, the overall effect is quite good from the feedback from some forum users.

A "leaked version" patch still makes Windows Vista more secure, smoother to run, and more resource-saving. When the official version of SP1 Patch is released, what are your expectations?

Article from http://vista.zol.com.cn copyright owned by original author