Summary of the Web Rich Text Editor

Preface

In addition to entering different texts, the rich text editor can also paste pictures and other multimedia information. It is also a WYSIWYG editor.

There are many editors available currently, and such a comparison table is found on the network:

Editor	Origin	Stability	Whether Lightweight	Technology Supported	Main advantages	Major weaknesses	Ver	Speed	Fat and thin (MB)
Ckeditor	Foreign veterans	Stability	No	Team	Powerful and stable	Bloated and slow loading	3.6	4	0.90
Kindeditor	Domestic (Shanghai-haoyue software)		Lightweight		Extension		4.0	2	0.24
Xheditor	Made in China (Taizhou-[Wang Yi])	Difference	Lightweight	Individuals	Mini-efficient, plug-in extension	Table editing, unstable	1.1	1	0.49
Ueditor	Domestic (Baidu)		Lightweight	Baidu	Small, layered architecture		1.1	3	0.44
Tinymce	Foreign veterans		Lightweight		Elegant, fresh, lightweight		3.4	6	0.99
FCKeditor	Veterans outside China [retired]	---	---	---	-----	-----	2.6	4	1.11
Ewebeditor	Domestic (Fuzhou-extreme software)				Powerful functions	Fees, plug-ins required	7.3	-
* Fat and thin: the volume in MB. this parameter is the size of the directory that has been modified by the user. For example, the kindeditor emoticons are removed and the volume is not calculated here; * Speed: the smaller the number, the faster the speed; * Ewebeditor: It is too commercialized and has not been tested (nor [cannot obtain] the latest version );

Note:

Ckeditor is renamed by FCKeditor.

Advantages and disadvantages

1, ewebeditor (domestic, http://www.ewebeditor.net/), advantages, function is very powerful; disadvantages: use needs to charge, heavy, slow.

2, xheditor (domestic, http://xheditor.com/), advantages: Open Source Free, lightweight, fast, simple, developed with jquery, especially like its File Upload; disadvantages: the current version does not support merging, splitting, and modifying the attributes of cells in a table.

3, ckeditor/FCKeditor (Foreign, http://ckeditor.com), advantages: Open Source Free, powerful, complete secondary development interface and documentation, you can add and edit form elements (such as buttons and input boxes), which is the best choice for developing Custom forms. disadvantages, heavy lifting, and uncommon features, for example, there are more bugs in modifying and editing form elements.

4, ueditor (domestic, http://ueditor.baidu.com/), advantages, open source free, table editing is the most flexible I have used in the editor, such as support cell merge split, secondary loading speed, with support from Baidu, there are few shortcomings and documents. The file uploading part cannot find any documents, although claimed to be lightweight, however, its full functionality, after UI removal, and after compression, JS is also nearly 300 K, the first loading speed is slow.

5, kindeditor (made in China, http://www.kindsoft.net/), advantages, open source free, lightweight, fast loading, documentation complete; disadvantages, does not support the merging and splitting of cells in the table.

Xheditor is the best option if you do not need the table merging and splitting function and use jquery at the same time. If you do not want jquery or are unfamiliar with jquery, consider kindeditor;

Ckeditor is the best choice if you need to create a custom form, for example, to add the form function to the editing page;

If the cost is very high, the client machine configuration is high, and it is used in the LAN, you can consider ewebeditor;

Ueditor is a good choice for table editing, especially for cell merging and splitting.

Supplement

Csdn uses the xheditor editor.

Xheditor works with syntaxhighlighter (a JS component used to highlight code text) to insert Code highlighting.