Talk about the way reports are drawn: SQL reports, Cell Reports, and Chinese reports.

Depending on how the report is drawn, report tools can be roughly divided into SQL canvas and cell cells: The SQL Canvas Style Report tool is characterized by dividing the report horizontally into several regions, placing report components on each area, and the report component location can be arbitrary and the components can overlap each other. The advantage of the canvas reporting tool is that it allows for visual data binding and free component location. The disadvantage is that inserting columns, the component alignment is difficult, the line and line often appear staggered between lines. This kind of report only solves the problem of "report" very well, but the problem of "table" still exists.       The more famous canvas-style report tools are mainly Crystal reports, Fastreport, etc. Cell Unit Format Reporting tool, which is a report as a range of contiguous cells. To change the position of a report component (typically text or graphics), you can only change the Gaolekuan of the rows so that the components cannot overlap and the cells are merged. The advantage of the cell format reporting tool is drawing lines, inserting columns, and making it easy to draw multiple row and column headings, but dynamic Data binding in the grid often requires handwritten formulas. This kind of report just solves the problem of "table" very well, but the problem of "report" still exists.       F1book is a more famous unit format Reporting tool. The characteristic of Chinese report is that the report is enclosed by a series of horizontal lines and vertical bars, then the corresponding data is filled in each grid. Therefore, the simple drawing line or not, directly related to the efficiency of the design report. Report tools should be based on the needs of domestic reporting users, combining the advantages of two reporting tools, so that users can visually bind data, but also like Excel to draw lines, so as to greatly improve the design of Chinese-style report efficiency. For example: Finereport report ....