Author: sodimethyl the source of this article: http://blog.csdn.net/sodmenote: This article can be copied and reproduced without the consent of the author, but any reference to this article should be retained by the author of the first three lines of the article, the source and. thank you. note: Our generation may feel the opposite of Mao Zedong or Mao election compared with our fathers, because we learned from elementary school to university, there have been too many "baptism" in this regard, so that no one can raise any interest or even, he will continue to be worried about the unprecedented cultural catastrophe on the Chinese land. In fact, many times, when we sum up some experience and lessons for teams, products, and even markets, some theories and concepts that once became very familiar with Mao often come to our minds, for example, building a branch in a company, and then surrounding a city in a rural area. The former is used by many enterprises in their internal personnel organizational structure, while the latter is used by many enterprises in product and market strategies. I have to say that Mao's theory is indeed in line with China's actual situation and China's national conditions. Until now, it has been well worth studying in many fields. This is an article about the team perception of "Company Commander + Political Commissar, black face + red face". Its core idea is: as a complete team, you need to pay attention to both business and ideas; focus on both performance and team growth. However, if we place all these responsibilities on the team leader, it is obviously inappropriate and unrealistic, because the team leader is also an ordinary person with limited energy, its expertise is also limited. Therefore, effective assistance within the team should be carried out in areas that cannot be taken into account by the team leaders. Such assistance should be spontaneous and not necessarily performed by a person in a fixed position. Introducing the text-from the organizational structure, a team can be like this: a Team Leader + several core teams + common team members. As early as in the first article "personal beliefs and team beliefs", I once said that team leaders and the core of the team are the main creators and disseminators of Team values. Does the entire team have core values, it mainly depends on whether these people can form a stable core value. In fact, what I have not clearly stated is that in the architecture of team leaders and core teams, the "persistent connections + Political Commissar" model is also implied. The so-called "Company Commander + Political Commissar" is not a new concept. Its other easy-to-understand name is: Building a branch in a company. Previously, I have been wondering why Mao Zedong made such a big mistake during the Cultural Revolution and destroyed so many excellent Chinese traditional cultural assets and so many intellectual and social talents, later, people worship him like this, especially the first generation of entrepreneurs formed during China's reform and opening up. Many of them use Mao Zedong's theory of governing the military and governing the party for their own company management, one of the most influential and well-known concepts is to build a branch in a company. The original Significance of "Company Commander + Political Commissar" is to strengthen the Organization's absolute control over the army. "company commander" can be understood as the backbone of business ", it can be understood as an ideological worker who coordinates internal team relationships and resolves internal team conflicts. The "company commander" ensures that the team can move forward at the business level, while the "Political Commissar" is responsible for the coordination and process organization of internal personnel of the team. We always say "as a team" and "as a team". In fact, in my opinion, the so-called "as a team" is based on the fact that you can fully perform the right actions on your own ", in terms of people-to-people relationship, there are two additional considerations: organizational structure and process arrangement. The former is the static form of the team, while the latter is the dynamic form of the team. By constantly optimizing these two aspects, we can continuously improve our team level. Before returning to the article, you only need to carefully study the organizational structure of several large enterprises in China, and you will easily find the shadows of the organization form of "Company Commander + Political Commissar", such as Huawei, haier and former giants. However, in my opinion, the most profound point is that we do not have to come up with two people in personnel arrangement, one responsible for business and the other responsible for thinking. If you want to learn, you can learn the most essential content. What is its most essential content? To put it bluntly, there is one sentence: the business needs to be done, and the idea needs to be done. Even more popular: black faces need to be sung, and red faces also need to be sung. "Business + thinking, black face + red face" allows us to take into account both business and harmony ". A team can exist and develop. Ultimately, it depends on business and performance. However, if business-only and performance-only, it is easy for the entire team to enter a very paranoid and stressful state. Therefore, we cannot blindly exert high pressure to achieve the only business growth. In the process of pursuing business growth, we also need to consider the personal feelings of team members, personal growth, and personal needs of each person. If we pin all the things of "Business and focus on team growth" on the only team leader, it is obviously unrealistic. Even if he is Wukong, I am afraid it is also a lack of separation. A team leader is also an ordinary person. We cannot pin all the hopes of team success on the illusory fantasy that "team leader must be a complete talent. Therefore, at this level, as the core of the team in the so-called team collaboration, we should take the initiative to undertake some business or ideological work. Since the Team leader does not have time to do ideological work, we can help the team leaders, communicate with the team members, and solve some puzzles about the team and project; now, as the team leader has only one piece of business to study, we can do our best to take the initiative of other businesses that need to be studied. Of course, the premise is that the core of the team should fully communicate with the team leader and reach a certain trust relationship. That is to say, in my opinion, what we need to grasp and pay attention to is the two most essential things of "Business and thinking", rather than the two illusory positions of "Lian long and Political Commissar. We can all be "company leaders" or "Political Commissar". The key premise is whether you realize that you need to take the initiative to assume some roles in the team, however, these roles do not need to be created in a certain position. You can use your influence and professional skills to find your desired direction and help your team make up for it. This is also a kind of mentality that I have always advocated. At any time, I will bring a positive attitude to the team, rather than the opposite. I will only complain and be harsh. People in the team often find many shortcomings in the team. Many people, the inertia of Xi inaction is: I only know that complaints are not good, that is not good, but Lin never thought about how he could help the team improve. What I want to say is that if you always do this, you will not eventually become a grievance, you will be eliminated by this team, what the team needs, not your own complaints and onlookers, as a member of the team, you should become a practitioner. If you discover deficiencies, you must find a way to improve them from your own perspective. Although they may not all be effective, but at least it will keep you in a positive attitude. This kind of mentality will benefit you a lot wherever you come.
