[Team System] introduction to scoring babies

Scoring a baby, as the name implies, allows the team to score other players. White point: There is nothing to do in the team, and finally can only be trampled to contribute points of the players. To be gentle: I waved my sleeves, not take away a cloud, oh no, do not take a little contribution points.

I don't know about the word "scoring baby" until the M1 team member is in the job-hopping phase. Until one day PM talked to me about the word, it was so "surprised" and "logically" appeared in my cognition.

At first I learned the word, and I thought it was a little bit of fun, thinking it was just an interesting M1 to take care of those students who contributed a little less than the standard contribution of the stage. Later, I discovered that this bad concept has spread to the interior of many teams.

There is a team of PM in the M2 phase of the purpose is simple and sad: more recruit some do not do the team into the group, so even if the final reply when the group's display score is not high, but in the sub-contribution time to do the person can confidently from the score of the baby's body, draw scores. Based solely on team presentation and contribution compared to team scores, these students will eventually get a higher score.

But on the contrary, if a team is relatively coordinated, the team's contribution is very poor, in the present team M1 show two teams between the score layer difference is low , the team of each member of the team project score is less than those who have a large number of scoring baby team- Even a good team of players pay a lot, even more than some of the most difficult group of people to contribute more.

This situation is unreasonable, I can not find the root cause, but I can also find that the cause of this situation is partly:

1. The scores of the display points are combined with the team, so the review does not give a score based on the individual component aspects of the tick.
2. M1 show divided between a team and a team the score layer difference is too small, I think this point is the review of the senior members of the Institute of the sake of soft hearted.

The following is a purely personal point of view: I think that in addition to the top four in the assessment of the team is serious, Team division practice in place, to make certain results and technology, the rest of the team has a relatively large defect, whether in the workload, team members of the work distribution, and other aspects. In order to suspicion, I do not talk about our group for the team project effort, take me more familiar with the Chronos group, I can see their daily work hard. For a long time they had to change from the previous interface to a better user experience and a more graceful interface effect, every night, the boys in their group almost did not sleep in the morning before five O ' Day. Of course, I'm not saying that night is a good thing, I'm just saying it's enough to show how they treat the project and the engineering attitude.

For these students, they pay so much effort, come up with such a lot of energy, and finally get to another group-only half of the work of the players-the same score, so for them is an unfair assessment?

　　Tolerance of poor quality engineering is the injustice of good quality engineering.

　　No one is born to be strong, the weak only exercise to become stronger. The workplace does not believe in tears, team projects are the same, I hope the next review of the predecessors do not believe in tears, only believe in quality.

So I hope that teachers and teaching assistants will consider the team contribution time, consider the maximum amount of basic contribution that everyone can get, taking into account the independent component score (The independent component includes several items: workload, project presentation effect, team management, etc.). How can mobilize everyone's greatest enthusiasm to participate in is the intention of the team project, if each group of PM are eager to get the score of the baby from the project itself, in the only case, those poor scores of the baby, could have received a better exercise, but now forced to participate in the project progress, not sad?

　　

[Team System] introduction to scoring babies