The name of CMM and cmme, one of the evidence of plagiarism

The text below comes from my upcoming article. Dr. Xie said that she has not copied but there are too many vulnerabilities in the article.

6.2.7 p120 page:

"In fact, the so-called unified methodology is standards. Although standards are not the purpose, they are necessary. By establishing standards, we can improve the efficiency of communication and reduce the waste of time, this is the unified organization-level process method required in the process of CMMs 3 or above and other standardized projects. If there is no unified standard, how can we make everyone do things in a unified manner? In this way, project confusion will be increased, which is detrimental to the progress of the project ."

From:

2004-08-10 08:14:04 wonder

Wrong. In the end, the so-called unified methodology is the standard. However, standards are not intended.

08:15:34 qingrun

However, standards are mandatory, which is the unified process method at the organization level required in the process of cm3.

The goal should be to solve the problem, right?

2004-08-10 08:15:57 wonder

Haha, qingrun, your focus is on standards. So. You care about this.

2004-08-10 08:16:38 wonder

This has nothing to do with tacit knowledge mining, but how to apply it. Therefore, the problems at the application layer and the basic layer should be considered separately.

08:16:42 qingrun

Yes, there is no unified standard. How can we make everyone do things in a unified manner? In this way, project confusion will be increased, which is detrimental to the progress of the project.

08:17:01 qingrun

I agree to this.

2004-08-10 08:17:05 wonder

And these things should only be effective within the software organization that needs to unify the software development process.

08:17:30 qingrun

However, it is of great benefit to unify the project team.

08:17:49 qingrun

At least it can improve the communication efficiency and reduce the waste of time.

2004-08-10 08:17:50 wonder

For example, in a research environment, the research direction is completely divergent. Standards are not required at this time. Standards are a constraint.

However, in a certain research direction, project-based organizations may be required, which requires certain standards.

2004-08-10 08:18:04 wonder

So it depends on your application environment.

08:19:24 qingrun

It's a research project, which is different from a project.

However, even in the Chinese Emy of sciences, there is also its methodology, except that the research methods in every laboratory and every new direction are different, and the tools used vary greatly. However, we can still find a lot of the same places, which forms a lot of uniform tools, such as microscopy, scales, microscopic imaging systems and so on.

Analysis:

This is another piece of refinement, and the original article copied my most important sentence: "This is the unified process method at the organization level required in the process of the CMMS 3 or above and other standardization projects." This sentence is completely copied without any modifications. I don't know if she really understands what the CMM is. However, she really does not know what the CMM is. This is because the evaluation in mainland China should probably be later than 2006 (the time may not be accurate) and has been upgraded to CMMS in a unified manner, rather than CMM. Because my conversation was held in 2004, it was still called CMM.

Here, I would like to know the reason why the doctoral thesis published in 2012 showed cm3 instead of cmmi3. If this reason is not plagiarism, is there any other possibility? I believe that cmmi3, which is definitely not cm3.

Dr. Xie is not from the software industry. She does not know. I can understand it, but companies do not know it. It is also a copy of the iron certificate.