The split of CTE in SQLSERVER2008 and the performance comparison of CLR _mssql2008

Source: Internet
Author: User
Tags comparison sql using
We create a new database project, and then we build a userdefinedfunctions,code like this:
Copy Code code as follows:

1:///<summary>
Sqls the array.
</summary>
<param name= "str" >the str.</param>
<param name= "delimiter" >the delimiter.</param>
<returns></returns>
1/8/2010 2:41 PM Author:v-pliu
[SqlFunction (Name = "Clr_split",
FillRowMethodName = "FillRow",
tabledefinition = "id nvarchar (10)")]
public static IEnumerable Sqlarray (SqlString str, SqlChars delimiter)
{
if (delimiter. Length = = 0)
return new string[1] {str. Value};
Return str. Value.split (Delimiter[0]);
}
<summary>
Fills the row.
</summary>
<param name= "Row" >the row.</param>
<param name= "str" >the str.</param>
1/8/2010 2:41 PM Author:v-pliu
public static void FillRow (object row, out SqlString str)
{
str = new SqlString ((string) row);
}

Then Bulid,deploy all OK, execute the following test T-SQL in SSMS:
Copy Code code as follows:

DECLARE @array VARCHAR (max)
SET @array = ' 39,15,93,68,64,43,90,58,39,9,26,26,89,47,91,57,98,16,55,9,63,29,69,16,41,76,34,60,68,64,61,53,32,30,11,72,57,63,36,43,22 , 14,60,38,24,5,66,26,26,21,22,99,55,18,7,10,46,76,27,88,9,29,89,75,48,72,94,59,35,19,0,35,79,11,87,49,68,30,91,35,9,7,34 , 47,41,61,98,13,22,1,26,80,35,48,34,92,24,85,90,51 ' SELECT ID from dbo. Clr_split (@array, ', ')

Let's look at its client statistic:

Then we execute the test T-SQL using the same array:

Copy Code code as follows:

DECLARE @array VARCHAR (max)
SET @array = ' 39,15,93,68,64,43,90,58,39,9,26,26,89,47,91,57,98,16,55,9,63,29,69,16,41,76,34,60,68,64,61,53,32,30,11,72,57,63,36,43,22 , 14,60,38,24,5,66,26,26,21,22,99,55,18,7,10,46,76,27,88,9,29,89,75,48,72,94,59,35,19,0,35,79,11,87,49,68,30,91,35,9,7,34 , 47,41,61,98,13,22,1,26,80,35,48,34,92,24,85,90,51 '
SELECT item from Strtotable (@array, ', ')

The client statistic of the split function implemented by the CTE:

By contrast, you can see that the CLR's performance is slightly higher than the CTE method, because the CLR has cache capabilities and it is more efficient to put a complex operation into the program than in the database.

You can also refer to:
Split string in SQL Server 2005+ CLR vs. T-SQL
Author:petter Liu

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.