The way of architecture: from the point of view of managers

Synchronous release in the knowledge, do not know in the blog park This is not a hydrological, can be the first page. But there are more than 1000 fans in the garden, and I would like to inform you of the following:

+++++++++++++++++++

This series is very difficult to write! --there is no time. It was planned for a week, how many weeks was it?

"Wild Programmer: Priority Recruitment" in, this big talk all say out, face can't play too ruthless ah. There are many students want to mix with me, but I do not have this strength at the moment (of course, there is no guarantee later, hehe). I think, also do not wait for later: I find a way, live write code/review code, willing to see the classmates themselves to see.

Interested students first add QQ group: 179742319, we want to think of ways together?

+++++++++++++++++++

Some comments on the previous article said I was in the "black" programmer. Although I did not quite understand the meaning of "black", but I guess they did not understand what I mean. So I try to do something a little more clearly:

Whether

you are an IT worker or an IT workforce depends not on (at least not primarily) your skill level, but on the "location" in which youare located. In other words, you are in the construction site, you are migrant workers, you are in the factory, you are a worker.

In addition, I have to do it again (again?) Description: This series of readers, in addition to programmers, more likely to be program-related entrepreneurs, software engineering project managers, product managers, etc., because we are talking about how to manage the project, such as design, requirements analysis and delivery, development and testing of interactive cooperation.

In short, we are in the management (ceo/Product Manager/project manager, etc.), and not by the Manager (programmer) Point of view to analyze the problem. How do you understand this sentence? Let me give an example, yesterday, someone quoted me a passage:

Started the following chat:

Tom Cruise (1772167830) 8:24:15
I can't read the above section.

Tom Cruise (1772167830) 8:25:59
Why is learning net a manager's angle?

Free Fly (2282636022) 8:25:53
It's simple to read and explain.

Free Fly (2282636022) 8:28:55
You're a programmer, you want to learn a high-paying technique, don't you?

Tom Cruise (1772167830) 8:29:06
Uh, yes.

Free Fly (2282636022) 8:29:35
I'm a programmer, so ...?

Tom Cruise (1772167830) 8:30:27
Wow, seems to understand something, it seems I have to understand the role of net first

Because it is in the QQ group chat, broth, the matter was later pulled:

Make the website the cockroach <[email protected]> 8:30:33
So because the moon cakes opened the programmer

I forgot to ask Tom Cruise really understand something, I want to say is: The manager and the manager of the contradiction is natural. No matter how we go to whitewash, the big banner of corporate culture and common values. If we really want to resolve this contradiction, then we must change from "management" to "leadership", this is another topic, here we only talk about management.

So what is the nature of management? What is an effective management? What is the essence of management? ......

All of these problems, different people must have different answers. But in general there are two kinds: managers like, and are liked by managers. And the manager likes, must be the manager does not like; the manager likes, must be the manager does not like.

This is a lot of people do not love to listen to, in fact, I do not want to say. Tearing those tender veils, bloody, too impersonal-but management is inherently anti-human. Human nature longs for freedom, and management is bound to you; human nature likes ease, and management makes you work hard; human nature likes to listen to "employees are our most valuable resource", and management will let you leave because of a box of mooncakes ...

Forget, say here, understand the people should have already understood, I do not want to continue to lose powder, is said to tell the story is kingly.

I work in a foreign company, found a very interesting phenomenon: most of the manager is very easy-going very polite, there is no "official Granville", most of the time, are smiling, "help a Busy", "hard", "good job! "The sort of thing that hangs on my tongue is totally different from the image we see in private companies on TV. I was very interested in this because I had been in business for almost two years.

Once with our boss chat, anyway, I was not ashamed of skin, just ask him why this is. His answer was interesting:

"The job is on our manager's head!" Messed up I said to the boss is the following who's problem, the boss never care. ' You are the manager and it is your responsibility to take the team below. If every team member can entreat the job well, what about the company manager? ’”

The most important thing is that the manager has no right to open people, or it is very troublesome to open a person. To you is who, you use who, did not pick three four of the right, pick the most that is in the time to pick up the job, the big deal when you can make a point of view, after the village no this shop, has to wait until the layoffs. So these managers have a particularly bitter, a bunch of crooked melon-cracked dates, all have to make up the use Ah!

You say this system is good! Yes, of course you are, but the manager is suffering. In fact, the pros and cons of any system are mixed, but the system above has at least one benefit: forcing managers to really take the "manager's place" to consider the problem. The essence of management is the effective organization to configure the existing resources to achieve 1+1>2 effect.

With our topic, it workers elsewhere, in my territory, can become it industrial workers. Note: change is not people, change is the environment. I said here, maybe you think you understand, "Well, yes, the environment changes people!" "But in fact when you do things, you're not careful, you forget that."

such as blaming subordinates.

"I Beg of you!" Can you just use the dessert a little bit? ”

"You pig brain ah?" None of this is going to happen! ”

"What evil did I do in my last life to recruit you such a legend?" ”

......

Some of these words I said, some of which I listen to, some of my heart. It's mean, but it's not really enough to express our anger and our grievances. For example, I remember the most profound thing: our company's designers made the offer, twenty thousand or thirty thousand of the list he can be false or more than four thousand or five thousand! This quotation is handed out, the whole project we have to do, but also to daotie money, more importantly, seriously damage the credibility of our company. What can I do? To deduct his salary? Cut off people, kill parents, you try!

Swearing is useless, and it's not right. In the current "labor law", where is hiring ah, just recruit a big uncle. Everyone do not rush to spray me, I also as Grandpa for many years, in fact, the heart is guilty, hehe. And enterprises really have to put the staff as big uncle to supply it-the market competition is too fierce. Now in this world, no one who is away from who can not live, "here is not left the left ye," Why should I be here by your bird?

Therefore, the good talent must have to rob, not so happy also has to use. The question is how to use it? The first thing many managers think of is "to change him." Whether it's scolding or training, brainwashing is based on a starting point: to make employees "better".

Is it useful?

I feel useless.

First of all, some things can not be changed. Leopards, or according to the moon's saying, "Can not change, is the weakness of human nature." For example, a sense of responsibility, such as the ownership of the spirit-he would have been a job, why should he have "ownership spirit"?

There's always something to improve, right? For example, the job skills, just graduated from the hair of the young man, can be compared with the old employees in 35? Yes, this is another problem for many companies: turning management into training and making the business a school. Is that OK? People's businesses, people are happy, why not? This is the kind of great enterprise Ah! A great enterprise that truly creates social value.

But, but, but, in doing so, the boss will not complain: "How I helped you to train you, now you have wings hard ... You ungrateful is not a thing ... "a lot of grievances are actually so, not only the workplace, people who have experienced naturally understand. Therefore, "Augmented Xian Wen" begins to mean: but do good things, MO asked the future.

Let's not pull too far. In short, I say these, is to say: Enterprise all kinds of so-called "help staff Growth" behavior, not management, at least not the management we define here.

The management we are talking about here is to face the reality and to create greater value by integrating the existing resources through rational distribution and dispatching. In other words, IT workers elsewhere, in my territory, can become it Industrial workers (important things we say three times).

In fact, this chapter is a repetition of the previous chapter. But I think there is still a need to devote a chapter of the space, and then to explain again. The transformation of thinking is the beginning of all great revolutions. There is no absolute truth in this world, your opinion is not the same as others, and it is not necessarily who is right or wrong, it is possible that your position is not the same, you observe the angle is different.

"Horizontal as the ridge side into the peak, the difference between the high and low." Like this sentence itself, with the growth of age, we all have different experience.

+++++++++++++++++++

Previous: Why it is an IT laborer

Next article:

+++++++++++++++++++

From the beginning: the preface: Something to be done.

+++++++++++++++++++

The way of architecture: from the point of view of managers