Thoughts on Borland and delphi9

After the failure of delphi8, it can be considered as a test product. Borland in. NET platform is already far behind Microsoft, So If D9 is launched this year, its function will be equivalent to vs2003 at most, and Microsoft has launched the vs2005 test version, when the official version is released next year, where will Borland be and will D10 be launched soon? This is impossible. It seems that after all, new elements must be added to D9 to compete with Microsoft's development tools. Otherwise, it will always be in the shadows of Microsoft.

In the case of Delphi under Win32, Borland in D9 cannot ignore this important component. Win32 development tools must be integrated into D9. The compiler should be enhanced. It is said that the inline function has been added to the build recently, and for in loop has also been done. These C ++ elements can also be used by Delphi developers. It is said that the new compiler is very good (I don't know if it is true ?). Delphi9 may integrate starteam, caliberrm, unit testing, and together functions. Otherwise, it is difficult to compete with vs2005 for the market. Now many programmers have abandoned Delphi, in fact, it is very difficult to use D9 to recover the market. It takes a long time to make unremitting efforts to achieve this. Make a hypothesis that vs2003 is an integrated development tool group. If Borland integrates all its development tools into an IDE, then he may be short in this field.

If we reflect on the failure of Delphi, we can also learn a lot. The management is not doing well. It is originally a small company, but the leadership is not enterprising, and competent people cannot support it, mistakes in decision making, making mistakes again, and positioning are inaccurate. development tools are changed throughout the day, not backward compatible, and production lines are too scattered, resulting in scattered funds, as a result, no online product is available, but when the product is not mature, it is launched and advertised. As a result, many programmers have switched to other tools. Because there is no future. In fact, I think D8 is equivalent to a test version at most, and there are many bugs, so I don't know how to do it. This should be learned from blizzard. If you don't take the initiative, it will be a high-quality product. In addition, Borland originally said that the D8 function is similar to the D9 that is not available now. What is the result ??

Make a nondescribeest item. What Boland lacks most is the spirit of ten years of sword grinding, impetuous, impetuous, and lack of Masters (but it will not be paid attention ).

??? Hope borlan can be used later.

??? (A new article on csdn came out when I was writing this thing. For D9, it seems that Borland has fallen, and there is no hope in two years, unless you want Chinese players to create a miracle at the Olympics .)